Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Healthcare › COVID Mask Mandate
K>K Personal answerYes, but only indoors or crowded areas |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
K>K Personal answerYes |
Social › Abortion
K>K Personal answerPro-choice |
Social › Gay Marriage
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Equal Pay
K>K Personal answerYes, and businesses should be required to publish their salary ranges for each position |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
K>K Personal answerYes |
Crime › Police Body Cameras
K>K Personal answerYes, this will protect the safety and rights of police officers and citizens |
Social › Marital Rape
K>K Personal answerYes, and consentual sex with a spouse under the age of 18 should be classified as statutory rape |
Domestic Policy › Insurrection Act
K>K Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Drug Price Regulation
K>K Personal answerYes, and we should socialize medicine and healthcare |
Healthcare › Pre-Existing Conditions
K>K Personal answerNo. People deserve equal health care access and not be punished for having an illness or health problem. |
Social › Gun Buyback
K>K Personal answerYes, but start with a voluntary buyback and ban on purchasing assault weapons before enforcing a mandatory buyback |
Social › Gender Identity
K>K Personal answerYes, and the government should do more to protect minorities from discrimination |
Healthcare › Mental Health
K>K Personal answerYes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services |
Social › Religious Freedom Act
K>K Personal answerNo, they should be allowed to deny A service to ALL customers, based on their religious beliefs - such as a kosher butcher not being forced to sell pork. They should not be allowed to refuse to sell a product or service to one person or group, when they would provide it to another person or group, based on a religious belief that encourages or tolerates bigoted or biased treatment of that person. |
Social › Transgender Athletes
K>K Personal answerAny sport that needs categories or limitations based on weight, height, strength class should already be rating and pairing up competitors in this fashion, regardless of gender - such as weight classes in boxing. In sports where those physical comparisons are not relevant, then gender is still not relevant, so there is no competitive justification for keeping transgender athletes from competing. And if there are no competitive justifications, there are no justifications at all. |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
K>K Personal answerNo, because not only is it a clear violation of the First Amendment and objectively immoral, Islamic extremists are responsible for a fraction of as many acts of violence and destruction as domestic terrorism groups and individuals radicalized by white supremacists. American citizens commit more crimes than immigrants - documented or otherwise - and they kill more fellow citizens in blatant acts of terrorism. If you want to make this country safer, you would literally do better to focus on white males with a history of domestic violence than on men from countries at the intersection of "a lot of brown people" and "where Christianity isn't a majority religion." |
Social › Planned Parenthood Funding
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
K>K Personal answerYes, every W2 or 1099 full time job should be required to pay living wage that will support at least one adult and one child, based on living costs in the area and adjusting every year for inflation. If they are not part time or as needed, the hourly income or payrate from the job should be in line with that same living wage standard. Any job that the breadwinner of a household might have, should pay accordingly, regardless of whether that breadwinner is representative of the bulk of that company's or industry's workforce. People shouldn't be forced to live in poverty because they have no choice but to take jobs others consider inappropriate to supporting a family. That is what forces people to use public safety nets, like food stamps. Either you pay everyone a living wage or you institute a genuine Universal Basic Income - anything else is the engine that drives cyclical poverty. |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
K>K Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Climate Change
K>K Personal answerYes, and encourage innovation in alternative energy sources, thereby increasing likelihood of production in the United States. Create grants to pay for resources like installation of whole-house fans and solar panels, or the purchase of electric or hybrid vehicles, in communities where even forgivable loans will not help anyone be more ecologically responsible. Increase access to public transportation with the deliberate intent of reducing congestion and pollution on the roadways. Much like with an oil spill, there are a lot of things we can do to clean this mess up, but a top priority has to be plugging up the source of the pollutants. And all those solutions can be deliberately driven to positively impact our economy first and foremost, if we do it right. |
the Economy › Paid Sick Leave
K>K Personal answerYes, but the federal government should sponsor this program instead of businesses |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
K>K Personal answerDrug use is an individual choice, drug abuse is a medical issue. It has never shown the slightest benefit to society, to individual users, even to reducing community crime and violence, to have drug possession be a criminal act. It has, in reality, cost obscene amounts of money, destroyed countless lives and helped to create entire organized crime syndicates. All drug use should be decriminalized immediately, and people with convictions based on simple possession should have their convictions and sentences reviewed for possible miscarriage of justice. And the current drug scheduling system should be replaced with a scheduling system that is about harm reduction and medical impacts, not arbitrary decisions about what inebriating or mind-altering substances should be legal and illegal. |
Domestic Policy › Term Limits
K>K Personal answerI'm not ready to decide on the benefit of term limits in Congress until after we've had publicly funded elections, and eliminated the center of most corruption in Congress - money in elections. After we've removed donations from the equation, I will have a better picture on the benefit of ongoing service in the legislature. |
Foreign Policy › Iran
K>K Personal answerNo, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels |
the Economy › Taxes
K>K Personal answerDisallow any deduction for corporations and individuals in the top tax brackets, that is remotely non-standard - you can still get your dependent deduction for your kids, but not for property taxes and mortgage interest on your $500k 3rd home (yes, that's real) or the yacht you rent out once a year to call it a business expense. Let's see how much money that brings in, then we can discuss the capital gains taxes and current tax rate tables. |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
K>K Personal answerNo, there should be a public service component to public education, but limiting that service to military inappropriately inflates the importance of military service above all other kinds of public service, such as doctors who volunteer at free clinics or travel overseas to provide medical care in war torn or heavily impoverished countries. Civic duty takes many forms, and it is certainly as important to our society to provide care and compassion to those in need as it is to make war or even just maintain a forward area in the "War on Terrorism." And "GI benefits," intended to honor civic duty in our society, shouldn't only go to people who are willing and able to serve in the military. |
Domestic Policy › Muslim Surveillance
K>K Personal answerNo, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary |
Elections › Foreign Lobbying
K>K Personal answerNo, ban all political donations and make elections publicly funded. |
Immigration › Immigration
K>K Personal answerYes, if they were born here |
Education › Student Loans
K>K Personal answerI support all reasonable tax law changes that will insure people in the top tax brackets are paying a reasonable percentage of their income/capital gains in taxes, commiserate with the number of other people whose intellectual, physical and emotional labor helped to create the products or services which provided for the returns on their own investments. No genuinely wealthy person provided all the labor behind their wealth, or accumulated it without the benefit of public services. All loopholes that disproportionally benefit the wealthy and powerful need to be closed, and if that is harming people in lower income brackets then correct for the latter without accommodating the former. The amount of tax income that will yield, when all the richest people and corporations actually pay what they should ow, will pay for A LOT more than a free college education for everyone (though it's one of the many good uses of that money). |
Education › Free College for All
K>K Personal answerYes |
Social › Death Penalty
K>K Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Deporting Criminal Immigrants
K>K Personal answerIf person immigrated to the US and did not acquire citizenship and they are convicted of a serious crime, part of their sentencing evaluation should be determining if incarceration and/or deportation are most appropriate. if they are naturalized, they are a citizen, and you cannot deport a citizen. |
Healthcare › Marijuana
K>K Personal answerYes, and immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses |
Elections › Mail In Ballot
K>K Personal answerYes, and implement a secure online voting process |
Social › Hate Speech
K>K Personal answerProtected speech should be explicitly defined in our constitution, and it should not include speech which incites violence and illegal discrimination or intimidate, or any speech which is knowingly spreading of false information with malicious intent. There are other "Free Speech" clauses, in other nation's constitutions, which set out such a definition. It still requires objective and subjective review, but it's better than allowing hate speech without accountability. |
Social › Confederate Flag
K>K Personal answerNo, it is a symbol of racism, separatism and treason |
Social › Government Mandates
K>K Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › No-Fly List Gun Control
K>K Personal answerYes, but not until the no-fly list screening process is improved for accuracy and includes due process |
Domestic Policy › Supreme Court Reform
K>K Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › NSA Domestic Surveillance
K>K Personal answerNo, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity |
Domestic Policy › Gerrymandering
K>K Personal answerYes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system |
Social › Women in Combat
K>K Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men |
Immigration › Illegal Immigrant Detainment
K>K Personal answerNo, only if they are convicted of a violent crime |
Science › Mandatory Vaccinations
K>K Personal answerYes, by law, all children should be vaccinated per the schedule created by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), with only medical exemptions allowed - such as a history of allergies to the vaccine's components. Willful medical neglect of a child is a criminal offense, and anyone who familiar with the ACIP policies and member expertise should consider rejection of that schedule to be medical neglect. |
Healthcare › Medicaid
K>K Personal answerYes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system |
Domestic Policy › Social Media Regulation
K>K Personal answerNo, not a per se regulation of social media companies. But domestic law might consider criminalizing the organized dissemination of fake/false information with the intent to do harm to an individual or entity or to destabilize the political or economic interests of any Sovereign country, including the United States. |
Immigration › Border Security
K>K Personal answerNo, make it easier for immigrants to access temporary work visas |
Crime › Private Prisons
K>K Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
K>K Personal answerYes, and the government should do more to require diversity in the workplace |
the Environment › Alternative Energy
K>K Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Sanctuary Cities
K>K Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Immigration Healthcare
K>K Personal answerYes, and grant them citizenship |
Elections › Campaign Finance
K>K Personal answerYes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections |
Healthcare › Single-Payer Healthcare
K>K Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Immigrant Laborers
K>K Personal answerYes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record |
Foreign Policy › Israel Boycott
K>K Personal answerNo, this is a violation of free speech |
the Environment › Alaska Wildlife Refuge
K>K Personal answerNo, and increase alternative energy subsidies to eliminate our dependence on fossil fuels |
Elections › Voter Fraud
K>K Personal answerNo, ID laws do not address voter fraud (a problem that is miniscule in proportion). All citizens should be registered when they reach legal adulthood, and all current adults should be immediately registered to vote using the information in certain federal databases (SSI, Medicaid, DMV, IRS, etc.), using the same duplicate-identifying algorithms developed for the 2020 Decennial Census. If anyone is missed by that, confirm their identity based on their unique circumstances. |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
K>K Personal answerKeep current rates but eliminate deductions and loop holes |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Elections
K>K Personal answerThe United States should work with other United Nations signatories to make sure elections taking place in vulnerable countries are fair and honest reflections of the will of its people. We should stop attempts to influence elections by corporate or international interests, not influence them ourselves. |
Social › Safe Spaces
K>K Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Patriot Act
K>K Personal answerNo, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant |
the Economy › Government Spending
K>K Personal answerNo, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy |
Foreign Policy › Israel
K>K Personal answerWe should give equal support to Israel and Palestine. |
Elections › Minimum Voting Age
K>K Personal answerYes, but minors should have to pass a test of political literacy in order to be able to vote |
Foreign Policy › NATO
K>K Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
K>K Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
K>K Personal answerNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Immigration › Border Wall
K>K Personal answerNo, we should respect the natural landscape along our borders, and not block free movement/involvement between communities that straddle those borders. Do not waste resources trying to prevent border crossings, which do not account for most undocumented workers, when creation of immigration policy that makes sense, and allows for reasonable access to working visas, resident visas and citizenship, will render the border wall issue nearly moot. |
Social › First Amendment
K>K Personal answerYes, but do not waste money removing existing references |
Healthcare › Medicaid Work Requirement
K>K Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Gun Liability
K>K Personal answerYes, if it can be proven in a court of law that (1) the manufacturers or dealers of guns could reasonably infer that a person or group were acquiring guns to sell illegally or engage in other illegal activity, and they did nothing to address that or (2) that they were designing, manufacturing or marketing their products to solicit sales from this illegal use of their products, they should be accountable to both criminal and civil courts. |
Crime › Defunding the Police
K>K Personal answerYes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls |
Social › Niqāb
K>K Personal answerYes, we should respect all cultural traditions |
Crime › Solitary Confinement for Juveniles
K>K Personal answerYes, and given that every study shows that solitary confinement is psychologically damaging to anyone, regardless of age, solitary confinement should be illegal for everyone, regardless of age. |
Social › Euthanasia
K>K Personal answerYes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice |
Crime › Mandatory minimum prison sentences
K>K Personal answerNo, ALL cases need to be judged and sentenced based on individual circumstances, not on some blanket rules which may be incredibly inappropriate in some situations. |
Immigration › Citizenship Test
K>K Personal answerNo, most citizens couldn’t even pass a citizenship test |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
K>K Personal answerThe U.S. shouldn't increase or decrease arbitrarily. It should be based on the jobless rate in the U.S. and the homegrown availability of truly critical skills. |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
K>K Personal answerYes, if they have Permanent Residency status and have lived in the country for a minimum of 3 years. And a very simple and inclusive test, to prove they understand the basic structures of our government and how our voting system works, might be a reasonable inclusion. |
Healthcare › Medicare Drug Prices
K>K Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Safe Haven
K>K Personal answerYes, drug abuse should be treated as a health issue, not a criminal issue |
Domestic Policy › Affirmative Action
K>K Personal answerYes. There are many things we can do to improve opportunities for people of color, the disabled, women, LGBTQ+ individuals, those living in cyclical poverty, etc. which will eventually make it less likely they will be denied opportunities based on prejudice and bias. But at this time, people in those groups are NOT treated equally under the law, in corporate America, within our academic and professional institutions, etc. That is a proven fact, backed up by study after study. Until we actually are treating those people equally, there need to be Affirmative Action programs which require diversity awareness in recruiting, hiring, school admissions, accessibility of internships and apprenticeships, etc. If we don't require it, many companies and organizations will not do it - not an assumption, again we have years of proof that they won't, because they didn't, until we required it by law. |
the Economy › Corporate Mega Mergers
K>K Personal answerYes, and the government should break up existing mega corporations |
the Economy › Universal Basic Income
K>K Personal answerYes, any serious research on Universal Basic Income demonstrates quickly that it saves the government so much money in the elimination of other poverty-based systems - like food stamps, WIC, Social Security, etc. - and the increase in economic growth from the free spending of people who don't lose 50% of their income to rent, that it more often than not pays for itself. All programs designed to limit "welfare" to only people who desperately need it costs us a fortune in bureaucracy and overhead, on dozens of agencies with millions of employees. A UBI also costs a fraction of what any of those agencies spend on reevaluations of a client's economic need, whether it's the weekly certifications for Unemployment Insurance or the yearly redeterminations for Section 8 housing. When every single citizen is qualified to receive UBI, even if most years their income never drops below the UBI so never has to be supplemented, the WIC, free school lunch program and food stamps stigma goes away. With UBI, people can save for the future while still spending enough to maintain a robust economy, and have a work/life balance that makes them happier, healthier and more productive. UBI isn't a panacea for everything wrong in our economic climate, but it's a hell of a booster shot to its immune system. |
Domestic Policy › Flag Burning
K>K Personal answerNo, this is a violation of free speech |
the Economy › Welfare
K>K Personal answerWe should institute a Universal Basic Income and use it to replace all the other offices administering welfare benefits - Universal as in, there are no restrictions, so that every person can afford a roof over their head, food in their fridge, etc. without first having to prove they are so far below the poverty line that they REALLY deserve help. The elimination of WIC, Social Security, Section 8, Food Stamps, Unemployment insurance and many more agencies will cover both benefit and administrative costs for the UBI program, and we stop making people compete for food security. |
the Economy › Free Tax Filing
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Labor Unions
K>K Personal answerMost labor unions benefit their members and community. There have always been issues of corruption in some unions, and there still are - but never has there been a time where corruption was the norm among unions, regardless of geography, industry or other affiliations. We should look at more ways to address corruption within unions, not make blanket statements condemning or praising them. |
Foreign Policy › Soleimani
K>K Personal answerNo, the strike was illegal since it was not approved by The U.S. Congress |
Elections › Campaign Finance
K>K Personal answerNo, and political campaigns should be publicly funded |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
K>K Personal answerYes, the government should intervene to boost a recovery |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
K>K Personal answerNo, this is a waste of time and money |
the Environment › Dakota Access Pipeline
K>K Personal answerYes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain |
the Economy › Capital Gains Tax
K>K Personal answerYes, and all income should be taxed at the same rate |
Education › Common Core
K>K Personal answerNo, teach to each student's potential instead of uniform testing |
Immigration › In-State Tuition
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Oil Drilling
K>K Personal answerNo, end all offshore oil drilling |
Healthcare › World Health Organization
K>K Personal answerYes, and increase the amount |
Domestic Policy › Whistleblower Protection
K>K Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
K>K Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Afghanistan
K>K Personal answerYes, but not for at least a couple more years while focusing on rebuilding the local governments and their fighting capacity while ensuring democracy there and countering corruption so that the United States will be able to exit the theater, leaving behind nations capable enough of defending themselves and quelling insurgencies. |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
K>K Personal answerYes, and require a public audit each year they are in office |
the Environment › Fracking
K>K Personal answerNo, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking |
Healthcare › Obamacare
K>K Personal answerYes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better |
Elections › Lobbyists
K>K Personal answerAll elections should be publicly funded, which would eliminate lobbyists - as they exist today - from the equation. |
the Economy › Overtime Pay
K>K Personal answerYes, and the government should do more to protect workers’ rights |
Domestic Policy › Eminent Domain
K>K Personal answerYes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency |
Elections › Electoral College
K>K Personal answerYes, and switch to a ranked voting system |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
K>K Personal answerReduce or eliminate spending on weapons and weapons-focused vehicles (our stockpile is already ludicrous) and increase spending on those serving in the military and their families, better schools, better services and care for veterans. Invest in the human capital, then see what the budget actually looks like and adjust accordingly. |
the Environment › Animal Testing
K>K Personal answerYes, but under strict ethical regulation |
Science › Nuclear Energy
K>K Personal answerYes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives |
Crime › Drug Trafficking Penalties
K>K Personal answerNo, the death penalty has never been proven an effective deterrent against any kind of crime, including murder and rape. The suggestion it will be a good deterrent against drug trafficking is laughable. |
Foreign Policy › Torture
K>K Personal answerNo, and we should strictly follow the laws of the Geneva Convention |
Foreign Policy › North Korea Military Strikes
K>K Personal answerNo, we must use every diplomatic option first |
Elections › Criminal Politicians
K>K Personal answerYes as long as 1) they have finished serving their sentence, 2) the crime was not committed while in office, & 3) it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
K>K Personal answerForeign aid should follow Congressionally-established and Constitutionally valid principles and be controlled solely by Congress, not the Executive branch. It's use should be subject to verification, to ensure that it is not being misused. Misuse should be construed as a diplomatic incident, and the aggressing country should have all aid suspended. |
Healthcare › VA Privatization
K>K Personal answerLess, we should increase funding to improve the current system instead |
Foreign Policy › Drones
K>K Personal answerNo |
Science › GMO Labels
K>K Personal answerA simple notation within the other nutritional data on a label is allowing informed consumers, large labels implying that the notification is a warning are unnecessary and not scientifically warranted. Many things need to be changed within the GMO/food patent/monoculture miasma, including better educating the population on what these things mean, both for their health and food costs. But turning GMOs into the center of the problem is a bad starting point - biodiversity incentives is a better one. |
Crime › Prison Overcrowding
K>K Personal answerNo, the prison system in general should be reworked, as it currently takes advantages of its place in society to avoid constitutional law and take away the rights of citizens. Instead of releasing criminals before the end of their sentence, issue just and reasonable punishment for crimes of differing caliber and public opinion. The fact that prisons are overcrowded is proof of an ineffective judicial system. |
Education › Universal Pre-K
K>K Personal answerWe should have freely available public daycare and preschool for all families, what amount of preschool should be folded into the legal minimum public education a child should be enrolled in is still a matter that needs to be researched and discussed. |
Transportation › Public Transportation
K>K Personal answerYes, and provide more free public transportation |
Education › Charter Schools
K>K Personal answerNo, we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead |
Domestic Policy › Social Security
K>K Personal answerIf we institute a Universal Basic Income, we will have no need to federally mandate a retirement age. Social Security does not need to exist, in a nation where UBI does. |
Immigration › Dual Citizenship
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Estate Tax
K>K Personal answerNo |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
K>K Personal answerFelons who have committed serious and/or violent crimes should lose their voting rights for one year for every charge they are convicted of. Once that time has passed, they should have to petition an independent national board for permission to have their voting rights reinstated, regardless of whether or not they are still incarcerated or on parole/probation. No one else should lose voting rights based on a criminal conviction. |
the Environment › Plastic Product Ban
K>K Personal answerYes, once we've first figured out how to make enough biodegradable versions of these products available, from somewhat local resources - importing has it's own footprint - to all the restaurants, cafeterias, grocery stores, coffee shops, food trucks, etc. in the country. It can't just be about forcing companies or consumers to switch to these products, you have to help them build the supply chain that is necessary to meet your goals and expectations. Just like electric cars are of little use to a community without any charging stations, you cannot completely morph the packaging industry (one of the largest industries in the world) without a solid plan for industry-wide changes. It's doable, it's just not doable solely by punitive measures. |
National Security › Military Congressional Approval
K>K Personal answerNo, Congress should approve all military conflicts |
Foreign Policy › Terrorism
K>K Personal answerForeign terrorism suspects already have constitutional rights. The only rights which the United States Constitution grants solely to citizens are the right to vote and the right to run for federal elections. The constitution grants due process under the law to anyone being tried within the United States and its territories, regardless of what country they are a resident or a citizen of. This needs to be an educational imperative in our country. |
the Environment › Paris Climate Agreement
K>K Personal answerNo, if we insist on claiming ownership of the title "world leader" we should lead and not follow on critical international matters, like climate change. |
the Economy › Tech Monopolies
K>K Personal answerNo, but make sure they pay their taxes and raise their wages. |
National Security › Foreign Assassination
K>K Personal answerNo. If they can be convicted of a crime by the country they are in, we should work with that country to help capture them and convict them. We should not even try to claim a right to extradite unless we have strong reason to believe we can prove to any international courts of law that the person was guilty of enough criminal actions in our country that we can convict them. When our government assassinates people, it inevitably causes too much long-term danger for our citizens to justify any supposed short-term safety. |
Science › Space Exploration
K>K Personal answerThe government should fund the Space Program, which includes exploring space travel, but is not exclusively limited to that. The amount of research and development, products, engineering innovations, etc. that come out of the Space Program have always been worth the money spent on the program. The Space Program is a better revenue source for our government than the military industrial complex has ever been, and it's a lot less inherently immoral. |
the Economy › Domestic Jobs
K>K Personal answerNo, but drastically increase taxes and import tariffs on outsourcing businesses |
Foreign Policy › NATO
K>K Personal answerYes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power |
the Economy › NAFTA
K>K Personal answerYes, NAFTA helps lower the prices of consumer products |
Domestic Policy › Political Advertising on Social Media
K>K Personal answerNo, but there should be regulations and there should be a ban on accounts/posts not explicitly tagged as Political, Bias, or Advertising. It should be clear to every user that it is an opinion/advertisement. |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
K>K Personal answerYes, as long as offshore income is reported |
Foreign Policy › India Arms
K>K Personal answerNo, and we should increase diplomatic efforts to resolve conflicts peacefully |
Domestic Policy › Edward Snowden
K>K Personal answerYes, he should be protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act |
the Economy › Federal Reserve
K>K Personal answerNo, they are already audited by an independent agency |
Foreign Policy › NSA Surveillance
K>K Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Cuba
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Farm Subsidies
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Property Taxes
K>K Personal answerThe government should alter all taxes depending on a person's income. |
the Economy › Tariffs
K>K Personal answerNo, only for countries that violate trade agreements and human rights. |
Foreign Policy › Jerusalem
K>K Personal answerJerusalem should be an autonomous city-state like the Vatican. We should support a two-state solution for Israel-Palestine. |
Education › School Truancy
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Pension Reform
K>K Personal answerNo, privately managed accounts will jeopardize the financial security of senior citizens |
the Economy › Government Pensions
K>K Personal answerYes, adjust them yearly for cost of living |
the Environment › Corporate Subsidies
K>K Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
the Economy › State Ownership
K>K Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Bitcoin
K>K Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
K>K Personal answerNo, there are too many hidden provisions in this specific agreement |
Foreign Policy › F-35
K>K Personal answerYes, and the government should dramatically reduce spending on no-bid corporate contracts that bloat the nation's military budget. |
the Economy › Online Sales Tax
K>K Personal answerNo. Online taxes should be regulated as an independent entity |
Domestic Policy › Air Force One
K>K Personal answerNo |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 19 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 22 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 21 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 30 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked less important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.