Try the political quiz

689 Replies

@4QZZJZTRepublicanfrom Texas  answered…2yrs

No, we need to find another diplomatic option. Once we go after North Korea, they are just waiting to drop an H Bomb on us and it will open the world to a gigantic world war that frankly, we cannot afford to lose.

@4R26H6LRepublicanfrom Missouri  answered…2yrs

Like Iran military strikes will be ineffective because we have dithered so long they are now extremely well protected from a military strike; we should asymmetrically attack N Korea and Iran to destroy their nuclear program(s). Cyber attack, infiltration of components that don't work, assassination of key personnel, we should do everything at our disposal to stop these people whose stated intention is to kill us for being us.

@4R23CGVRepublicanfrom Kansas  answered…2yrs

I think all forms of deterrence should be on the table when it comes to North Korea and their nuclear weapon capabilities.

@4QZ8Z6QRepublicanfrom Missouri  answered…2yrs

No, but we should use economic pressure to cause North Korea to collapse.

@4QYSZYLDemocrat from Arizona answered…2yrs

Yes, along with other nations threatened by their capabilities. We are not the sole police presence of the world.

@9YC9PJ6Constitution from Michigan answered…8mos

North Korea is known for its human rights violations, nothing is done to them because they're supported by China. Go ahead and do it.

@4QYY4TJRepublicanfrom Florida  answered…2yrs

No, South Korea must be the country to take action with the full backing of the United States.

@9MRKQKJRepublican from California answered…2yrs

Only if there is undeniable evidence that they are planning to attack.

@9YBHNK2Green from Illinois answered…8mos

America needs to mind their own buissness and focus on getting themselves out of debt. Stop getting involved in evrything when it doesnt even concern the U.S.

@4QYVHC4Republicanfrom Colorado  answered…2yrs

Yes. Then we should try Bill Clinton & Maddie Halfbright for treason after they let Kim jon il get nukes.

@B4HRFDXRepublican from Illinois answered…1wk

@9HP9TRJSocialist from Washington D.C. answered…2yrs

No, we must use every diplomatic option first, and North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

@9HMRNRCVeteran from Virginia answered…2yrs

Yes, unless we can come to an agreement of peace and if needed we can take action.

@9HLFWFTWorking Family from New Jersey answered…2yrs

Yes If there is proof they have nuclear weapon capabilities

@9HK94FRVeteran from Texas answered…2yrs

Yes, but only of we believe that they are an imminent threat.

@9HDMV6TVeteran from North Carolina answered…2yrs

NO!!! ARE THEY INSANE? Has anyone ever heard of a thing called "assured mutual destruction"? It means that if we attack with drone strikes THE WORLD ENDS.

@9HBCXK2Transhumanist from Georgia answered…2yrs

Yes, but only if we see that there is imminent threat to our homeland or national security interest.

@Jennifer-Gundlac…Green from California answered…2yrs

No. Until such time as we are at war with North Korea, we should not aggressively pursue actions that could lead to such a war.

@9H8VMJSPeace and Freedom from Wisconsin answered…2yrs

Yes, if there is a Congressional declaration of war against North Korea

@9H6V899Peace and Freedom from Kansas answered…2yrs

No, but the situation should continue to be closely monitored

@9H6NT9KSocialist from Ohio answered…2yrs

No, and we cannot expect other countries to denuclearize until we ourselves, as well as other large nuclear powers, denuclearize as well, and it could have negative consequences for us as well as South Korea

@Michael-CollierDemocrat from Arizona answered…2yrs

Take out their political leaders from the inside out, then reunite the Korean peninsula under South Korea's current governance

@9H5JGSMVeteran from New York answered…2yrs

No unless a military attack by North Korea is deem immanent

@9H2CZ45Veteran from Kansas answered…2yrs

Yes, but only when it is absolutely necessary to deter a threat. Also, the moment you remove this option from the table you weaken your ability to negotiate.

@9GZ5LY5Women’s Equality from Washington answered…2yrs

Yes, but only if they openly attack the US. The US should never strike first.

@9GSR359Republican from New York answered…2yrs

No unless we know they are going to strike at us or have suspicions.

@Beth-SimsGreen from Arkansas answered…2yrs

Only at the behest and with cooperation from the UN and North Korea's neighbors.

@9GQXRRWLibertarian from California answered…2yrs

No, but we should try to persuade/overthrow their current regime and untie them with South Korea and make them a democratic nation.

@9GPNMTDSocialist from Indiana answered…2yrs

No. They are not an immediate threat to us, and there are other countries involved that might be affected by such actions.

@9GMW7RWWomen’s Equality from Michigan answered…2yrs

No, because we don't need a war between the United States and North Korea.

@9GHK3RMAmerican Solidarity from New Hampshire answered…2yrs

@9FZ9R45Women’s Equality from Virginia answered…2yrs

No, we must use every diplomatic option instead, and if that doesn't work, let someone else handle it

@9FWTFWTPeace and Freedom from Maryland answered…2yrs

Only if the citizens are not in danger of death/physical harm

@Lloyd-BrownLibertarian from Utah answered…2yrs

If they threaten us with nuclear weapons and attempt to use them on us, then yes. In the meantime we should be keeping a close eye on North Korea and any other potential threats to our nation's safety.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart...