A tariff is a tax on imports or exports between countries.
Only increase tariffs on China.
Yes, but only for countries like china that abuse their workers/citizens
There are too nuisances to answer this question properly in the space provided
No and federalize production.
Yes, but only from china.
Tariffs can be laid on a reciprocal basis
Only to achieve reciprocity.
Yes, but only for imports from countries that do not have democratic governments
Yes, but only with countries that we have a trade deficit with.
Still have much to learn regarding this subject matter
Only on some products. If not much of it is being produced here now, then no. Also, don't raise the tariffs too high.
Only if local products are freely available at competitive prices with comparable standards.
I do not have enough information to give a opinion.
Yes, but only for internationally held companies.
Yes but only for countries with active human rights violations.
@JoaLibertarian2yrs
would have to assess how this first round of tariff increases affected our economy
Yes, and there need to be incentives for less consumerism and disposing of one-use goods. A culture of re-using, reducing, and recycling within the American economy is needed.
Yes, but only by a little bit
In most cases no, but it depends on the specific situation.
Product quality is horrible due to companies cheap resources but prices keep increasing. This needs to change
I am uneducated on this issue.
Depends on products and country
Yes, but only temporarily until concessions on trade can be drawn from opposing nations
Yes, but only in the event that the need to do so is to protect American interests.
No, the government should do it's best to incentivize domestic production rather than resort to tariffs, which act as too much of a punitive measure to other countries to what is, effectively, a domestic problem caused by the free market.
No, but limit imports as a percentage of the market share.
Increase tariffs on countries without basic protections for workers to insure American companies are operating on a neutral playing field.
Yes, but only if there is a trade imbalance, manipulation, or threat with a country in question.
Yes, but it should be a Carbon Boarder Adjustment Tax to reduce greenhouse gases
Given certain circumstances - yes
Yes, but it depends on what the country of origin is.
Perhaps, this is a country by country issue.
Yes, we should attempt to mirror partner nations.
Yes for countries with serious human rights violations
depends on where its from and whit is being imported
I feel that I do not know enough about this topic to contribute an answer.
No, but keep the current tariffs on manufactured goods while reducing tariffs on raw resources to promote domestic manufacturing of products.
It depends on the products and the current tariffs.
Only for countries who are violating trade agreements.
No, the market should be controlled in a way that makes it fair for all buyers and sellers.
Depends on the situation and the ancillary impacts to the economyz
Yes, but tariffs should not be over 50%.
Yes, for countries that do not allow free market
Only for targeted industries that are subject to predatory trade practices
This should be evaluated & diplomatically resolved for all countries
Only if the country in question is importing shady products from shady origins.
Only on products and countries that do not treat workers properly
Only to level the playing field for U.S. businesses
No because the consumers will pay for it
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
