A sanctuary city is a city that adopts local policies designed to not prosecute people solely for being an undocumented individual in the country in which they are currently living.
The federal government should reduce taxes and funding across the board.
No & ban the sanctuary cities plus hold the cities accountable when they fail to uphold the law
Yes, but sanctuary cities should be a state issue, not federal.
No, only refugee cities should receive funding
It depends how much the city is actually helping people
Yes, if taxes are enforced
Yes but to an extent, we should not be giving all of our money to them.
They should receive funding to a certain point
I don’t understand this question.
Yes, but with the goal of either gaining their citizenship if they are going to live here, or they will have to return to their country after a designated amount of time.
Yes but only if their government swears to start private education programs to make pathways for citizenship and not supplement jobless criminals
Yes, but not a whole lot
No, and sanctuary cities should be be held responsible for any act of terrorism or violence perpetuated by an enemy of the State under the express autonomy granted by sanctuary status
No, I don't think we need to fund something like this monetarily. I think we should just check what they are doing in the country and if it is beneficial then give them citizenship. If they are doing something harmful they should be deported. I don't think people should give up on the people doing illegal things though I think they should still be rehabilitated.
No. If they're going to exist, they should be privately funded.
Yes, and immigration enforcement should end deportation of illegal immigrants that haven't committed crimes.
Yes just reduce the amout of spending
I think it depends on what the cities would use the funding for.
Not for being a sanctuary city but they should continue receiving funding for things that are already receiving it for.
Yes, undocumented individuals have a rough time getting in legally
federal funding is cringe
if it is a government issue then yes it need government funding but truthfully i knjow veyr little about sanctuary cities
No, and all proclaimed sanctuary cities should have all funding cut off
No, there should be no difference between sanctuary cities and other cities
There shouldn’t be any federal funding at all for any city
They should be somewhat funded but they should not be a priority in the budget of the government.
As long as the states can all decide what and how they want to be able to work with the government. Cities can’t always just pick and choose when they should receive undoing for their programs.
Yes, As long as they listen to any federal action after it.
Only for use of legal citizens.
For the sole purpose to help them become legal citizens.
No because I don't feel federal funding should be put toward illegal activities. Rather than use it towards something that is more necessary
Yes, undocumented immigrants make up a large portion of the workforce. There are jobs, that nobody else wants to do, and it helps to fuel economy
Yes, as long as there are not to many sanctuary cities.
no but give chance for them to be legal
only if they are legally seeking US citizenship---coming here legally.
In the country you see the city you like to be in.
No, unless they pay taxes
No, and cities should be financially penalized for enabling individuals to stall or avoid steps required to stay in the country. Incentivize becoming a citizen and promote acceptance of all willing to follow the law.
Let the state handle it.
No! Sanctuary cities offer safe Havens for sex trafficking. The citizenship process should be made much more attainable though, and immigrants in good health should be required to work.
@9WKLSRMRepublican10mos
No, not for immigrant services; yes, for things not immigrant related
@9WDRNY6Republican10mos
Yes, but not for the purpose of being a sanctuary city
@9WDLL32Republican10mos
IF it is to help them become legal citizens
@9WBVDLRConstitution10mos
Sanctuary cites should be funded by private charity’s
Yes, as prosecuting for being undocumented/black/male/female/LGBT/etc... is very discriminatory and would be against human rights.
@9W6HY23Republican10mos
No, keep the current rate
I believe it depends on how impacted the city is by illegal immigrants.
Maybe a little but not a lot of money
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
