Try the political quiz

7,764 Replies

@6CQDV95Democratfrom Illinois  answered…2yrs

@5R96BRNRepublicanfrom Northern Mariana Islands  answered…2yrs

Just make it over the counter (and hence more affordable) like many other countries do.

@6B6CXJPConstitutionfrom Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs

Sex is a leisure activity, just like sky diving. You don't have to do it; but if you do pay for your own parachute.

 @Some-Crusader-12…Constitution from California commented…2mos

No, the government should not decide what services a private business can provide

Unfortunately yes, birth control is needed in this hyper-sexualized society that progressives utterly adore, but I'm not having a single penny of mine cover for the recklessness of others.

 @Some-Crusader-12…Constitution from California commented…2mos

No, the government should not decide what services a private business can provide

Crap wrong comment

@6DBK9VGGreenfrom Washington  answered…2yrs

No, because birth control kills a life that has just been made. The second that an egg is fertilized, a baby is created, and it is alive. Using birth control is killing a baby. It is no better than abortion.

@6B6RDCRGreenfrom Missouri  answered…2yrs

Yes! We make such a big deal about pro-life, but won't give birth control to people who need it. If a person can't afford birth control every month, do you really think that they can afford a child? People are going to have sex. It's natural and in our DNA, but we are smart enough creatures that we can get our fix without having a child. Religion says all these things about it, but religion should have nothing to do with you insurance or government.

@5TWBZ59Greenfrom Kentucky  answered…2yrs

Yes. If Viagra is covered then so too should the preventative measures designed to deal with Viagra's aftermath!

@5WH8DXHRepublicanfrom New York  answered…2yrs

If free birth control, then free ED drugs for men. Only free birth control for women is discrimination against men who have to pay for a limited amount of prescription drug.

@6K3ZXBBRepublicanfrom Illinois  answered…2yrs

If pregnancy is treated as an illness then all forms of pre fertilization birth control should be considered preventive care and covered under the insurances preventative care policies. These policies do. Or need to be the same for all companies.

@5VW9HLSDemocratfrom Virginia  answered…2yrs

If they won't cover it in their insurance premiums then they should be required to offer paid maternity leave.

@5YWY6WJDemocratfrom Minnesota  answered…2yrs

Yes, depending solely on the fact that there should be SOME sort of population control, especially considering that younger people are half the time uneducated/get tangled with emotions that coerce their decisions, such as having a child young and not being able to provide.

@6CMX89ZRepublicanfrom Georgia  answered…2yrs

no, birth control is murdering a human being and that action will be charged on company as well

@5XR2NZHGreenfrom Washington  answered…2yrs

Publicly funded abortion and contraception should be more widely available. Planned Parenthood's funding should be increased and more governments should adopt policies that discourage population growth.

@5R85Z5GConstitutionfrom Virginia  answered…2yrs

Since when is birth control a "Health issue" pregnancies aren't contagious and we've never had an out break of them.

@6964CHHGreenfrom North Carolina  answered…2yrs

Yes, while birth control is sinful, it is better than abortions, and you can't do much more than that in a sexually saturated society.

@69Q4MGHLibertarianfrom Iowa  answered…2yrs

Yes until pro-choice is approved and no longer an issue, women should have another option.

@6FXXRCHSocialistfrom Texas  answered…2yrs

I feel that if more insurance providers did this the birth rate may slow down and give us the ability to have less children in homes, less use for abortion, and advance the chances of more high school graduates.

@68RLX26Democratfrom New Mexico  answered…2yrs

Yes - it could possibly reduce the number of families on welfare, abortions and unwanted children who ultimately wind up in prison.

@6GHGTJQRepublicanfrom New York  answered…2yrs

@5T3LQRPDemocratfrom Louisiana  answered…2yrs

No because then girls can have sex all the time without any worry and then they get an STD and they don't make a pill called "STD control"

@5SJC8GMDemocratfrom Arizona  answered…2yrs

@5SJ4C9GRepublicanfrom Texas  answered…2yrs

Yes If It's For Health Reasons Not For Unprotected Sex Benefits

@5WKLVHYRepublicanfrom Indiana  answered…2yrs

Humans should only try to make babies when they are willing to so they don't need birth control.

@5XP6B73Democratfrom New York  answered…2yrs

Yes, birth control is a problem for a lot of Americans. Especially since we have no control of our population as children don't practice safe sex. From sexually transmitted diseases to unplanned births. I believe that the prerequisite to receive free birth control though are preliminary screenings to ensure that those that take birth control understand that birth control is not 100% and that choosing abstinence is always a better choice.

@5VLFQKPConstitutionfrom Florida  answered…2yrs

No, single males or parents who are too old to have children have no need for these services. By having the health insurance providers require this service increases the cost of the service.

@5SJV4FQGreenfrom Arizona  answered…2yrs

Yes, birth control is a medical necessity for many women, and Insurance companies should not be allowed to push their "morality" on the general public.

@Brother-JauffreRepublican from Illinois disagreed…1yr

No, the government should not decide what services a private business can provide No

If you don't like there morality find a different insurance company

 @Some-Crusader-12…Constitution from California agreed…2mos

No, the government should not decide what services a private business can provide

I second this

@5TKRRDGGreenfrom Missouri  answered…2yrs

@6B5WYV3Democratfrom Georgia  answered…2yrs

What's so hard about buying your own birth control? is it that expensive? If it is then don't have sex. You have hands.(unless you don't then I dearly apologize for being insensitive.)

@68M6KF2Greenfrom Texas  answered…2yrs

birth control and surgeries such as vasectomies and hysterectomy.

@68SPGHQGreenfrom Colorado  answered…2yrs

Yes! Until poverty, child abuse and therefore potential to be educated sufficiently is successfully addressed, birth control needs to be very easily accessed. An educated mind is a less emotional and impulsive mind. I think it should be available ALSO OTC but kept/stored behind the pharmacy counter.

@69Q42KTDemocratfrom Maine  answered…2yrs

America should stop being so barbaric and implement free health care

@5XRMVLBGreenfrom Georgia  answered…2yrs

@6LTV2X4from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs

@5WHWR8GGreenfrom Florida  answered…2yrs

Yes, population growth is out of control and is an existential threat to humanity.

@63VQKB4Republicanfrom Kansas  answered…2yrs

If you need help with birth control...first lesson-close your damn legs

 @Some-Crusader-12…Constitution from California agreed…2mos

No, the government should not decide what services a private business can provide

Amen

@68Z748XDemocratfrom Hawaii  answered…2yrs

No, because it makes teens think they can have sex any time they want because of birth control pills.

@5TPWPK5Republicanfrom Indiana  answered…2yrs

No, why should a retired 65 year old woman have to pay for birth control or pregnancy on her insurance.

@5WJ3G7KDemocratfrom Texas  answered…2yrs

Yes. I believe it should.. the number one seller in America is sex and if it's going to continue that way than I believe it should be offered free to the people who feel the need to be on BC... Especially in teens nowadays. It can stop the abortion rate to an extent.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart...