Try the political quiz

2.1k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...5yrs5Y

No

 @9FLBD97from Maine agreed…6mos6MO

While the blow of an explosion can kill many million people in one blow, radiation poisoning is one of the most cruel way to die, as it leads to the body slowly decomposing itself. Most people are not able to properly protect themselves from radiation poisoning.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...5yrs5Y

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

 @9F7SL9N from Texas agreed…7mos7MO

I personaly would not like to lose my life in a fight that does not effect me just because i got drafted.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...5yrs5Y

Yes

 @9JDGJQB from Florida disagreed…2mos2MO

We currently have 3 escalations in progress (Israel/Hamas, China/Taiwan, Hothies/US). To add another conflict would stretch our military resources to the limit.

 @9F8MGYB from Mississippi disagreed…7mos7MO

I'd reckon that the last time we went and invaded a random country would be evidence enough to not do it again. The invasion of Iran would be quick, the occupation would be long and drawn out. Do we really want another Iraq or Afghanistan?

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...5yrs5Y

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

 @Dry550Independent from Illinois commented…4mos4MO

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

I agree with you, if Iran becomes the 10th country to obtain nuclear weapons, then the balance of power will inevitably shift and we as a country will have to defend itself, fighting back if necessary.

 @9H4HP4Cfrom Virgin Islands disagreed…4mos4MO

Iran having nuclear weapons is a threat to global peace and stability, that´s undeniable. But the US should not seek a war that would likely lead to a third world war. Fighting Iran with nuclear weapons is dangerous and we should try by every means to reach a diplomatic agreement. If that´s not possible than US must put effort in creating an international peace environment, based on nuclear disarmament. Concluding, a war at this point would bring catastrophic consequences to everyone, and therefore it must be avoided at (almost) all costs.

 @9GWSKNMRepublicanfrom Maine disagreed…5mos5MO

slightly agree with this, if Iran develops nuclear weapons then we should fright try t negotiate and then try using means of force

 @9GCKBLS from Washington disagreed…5mos5MO

The attack wouldn't be on the guilty anymore but rather on the innocent civilians. This would be comparable to the current genocide of the Palestinian people.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...5yrs5Y

 @9D5XBHH from Georgia answered…8mos8MO

 @9C5KXGM from Georgia answered…10mos10MO

 @9JDPKH4Democrat from New York answered…2mos2MO

No, but efforts should be made to destabilize the current authoritarian government there and support a secular democratic republic.

 @99T45NQSocialist from California answered…1yr1Y

 @98WMYYF from Texas answered…1yr1Y

 @8FY4KX4 from Washington answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only if they openly attack the US. The US should never strike first.

 @8FR9NT3 from California answered…3yrs3Y

If they continue to disregard the safety of the world with development of certain weapons, strengthening or aiding terrorists organizations, and causing other human attrocities.

 @9BBKWFGIndependent from Ohio answered…12mos12MO

Going to ‘ war’ won’t solve the problem USshould stop JPCOA negotiating with the murders from of the Islamic Republic, freeze more Iranian assets increase sanctions , declare IRI a funder of terrorism condemn the gender apartheid in Iran and do MUCH more to support the Iranians fight for liberty

 @96GLZPQ from North Carolina answered…1yr1Y

No, but both the U.S.A. and Iran should come to a mutual agreement of a nuclear phaseout and establish moves towards environmentally friendly technologies.

 @8VPTCRJLibertarian from Colorado answered…3yrs3Y

Only if your attacked and if Saudi Arabia has a problem with Iran because their state support of two different sects they need to use their own army because they have the biggest defense bugget in their region.

 @8VGZP9YRepublican from Texas answered…3yrs3Y

 @8G4HFRL from New York answered…3yrs3Y

Try to avoid war but never allow a country to create or fund violence against the USA

 @9KZZVGYLibertarian  from Florida answered…6 days6D

Depending on iran’s continuing interest in disrupting trade and attacking international waters and funding the houthis, missile strikes or covert operations could be in order. As for an actual boots on the ground war per se, no.

 @9KZGCSJ from Tennessee answered…1wk1W

No, as long as Iran doesn't bother the US then they should be allowed to do as they please, including developing nuclear technology

 @9KWYLXL from Michigan answered…2wks2W

No only if the US or its personnel or assets are attacked by Iran directly. If Iran is back on track to develop nuclear weapons then diplomatic efforts should be made to develop treaties regarding this issue.

 @9KW9J55 from Maryland answered…2wks2W

No, the U.S. should feel lucky the rest of the world hasn't sanctioned them for innumerable crimes against humanity.

 @9KRQSBHRepublican from California answered…3wks3W

The U.S. should increase diplomatic and rhetorical pressure. If Iran continues to attack American soldiers and Allies, the military should conduct targeted strikes to quickly cripple any military strength, forcing a quick end to a conflict.

 @9KMD639 from Illinois answered…3wks3W

It is a very hard decision and should be handled carefully. It's not a simple yes or no question, rather what it comes down in the moment.

 @9KM3V59 from Missouri answered…3wks3W

Endangering normal civilians again is annoying enough. If we have to fight we must. Either get destroyed or completely delete the enemy, no more issues come by until then.

 @9KJY6M4Republican from New York answered…3wks3W

We should keep peace in the World, they help their Middle Eastern friends, and we help our friends it child's play on how the president just brings their people to war and die for no reason.

 @9KDWFWSfrom Maine answered…4wks4W

An iranian nuclear bomb is the last thing this region needs, especially because Israel also posseses nuclear weapons. This region has seen enough blodd shed, but if Iran is so keen for a war against the US and Isreal, well be careful what you wish for.

 @9KCX87K from Oregon answered…4wks4W

yes, in fact, we should go to war with every single country and drop nuclear bombs on the weakest of them all.

 @9K3HGQV from North Dakota answered…1mo1MO

Yes, should hostilities boil over and Iran makes the first move. Continue trying to talk them down though.

  Deletedanswered…1mo1MO

Both Yes and No; No, the U.S should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels; Yes, but only with missile strikes; Yes, But only if they develop nuclear weapons.

 @9JTJWZ5  from California answered…2mos2MO

No, the US should not affiliate with the Middle East anymore. The only thing they need to do is call for a permanent ceasefire. I would rather they BUY Palestinian land from Israel, and EVEN THAT is pushing it.

 @9JP52SZ from Wisconsin answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but try to have them give up arms and have them never produce nuclear weapons first, if they don't agree, then go to war.

 @9JCNDZG from Texas answered…2mos2MO

No, because we don't need conflict with other countries when we need to take care of things in our own country.

 @9JC633B from Florida answered…2mos2MO

Iran is complicated, it is a human rights nightmare, and it needs to answer for US deaths and imprisonments. However I don't think a war is a particularly good investment for the US at this point.

 @9J8R29N from California answered…2mos2MO

No, instead encourage ongoing protests against the theocratic regime and allow them to define the country they want to live in.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...