In June 2019 tensions between the U.S. and Iran escalated after a U.S. surveillance drone was shot down by Iran’s revolutionary guard in the Gulf of Oman. The U.S. claimed it was an “unprovoked attack” and the drone was flying in international airspace. 2 weeks earlier the Trump administration blamed Iran for the attacks on two oil tankers who were bombed in the Gulf of Oman. Iran denied any involvement. In early June Iran announced that it would break its uranium stockpile limit set under the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Under the deal Iran was allowed to keep a maximum of 660 pounds of uranium enriched to 3.67%. Analysts predict that if the uranium is enriched to 20% or more Iran would be capable of developing nuclear weapons.
No, unless Iran does something especially egregious
Yes, but only to protect the human dignity of Iran's people.
Yes, If no other alternative is possible
Yes, as a last resort in our situation
No, the U.S. should seek diplomatic means to end hostilities, but worst-case scenario war is an option.
I have absolutely no knowledge of the US and Iran's conflict. I wouldn't know.
No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm and to give more freedom to its citizens through diplomatic channels
Depends on the geopolitical situation
No not at the moment, give it some time till we do, at the very least until they give us probable cause, such as threatening the US directly
No they should work with their allies to try to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons
Yes, but only if the relationship between us gets out of hand and dangerous
No, the last thing we need is more dead citizens. Iran isn't likely to be talked down from it's dangerous position, but diplomacy could be tried.
No, we should avoid war at all costs, but appeasement is not the answer.
As much as I want to take care of the issue swiftly, we need to come to some resolution with this conflict.
No, but be prepared to retaliate with excessive force to quickly and decisively destroy them if they commit any acts of aggression.
no because war with any country is a possibility for another world war
@9T5JVR8Constitution10mos
Only if they start the fight
@9SYB6C7Constitution10mos
The U.S. should retaliate when necessary but no launch a full scale war
@9SX5CCCRepublican10mos
Yes, but only with missile strikes and only as an ultimate option. Full embargo and missile attacks on Iran's proxies should be the first choice.
@9STGNZXIndependent10mos
Yes, but only if it is approved by Congress
No, unless they attack or seriously threaten the United States
@9SL65DFRepublican11mos
Only if they show an act of war against the U.S.
@9SKZLYWRepublican11mos
Yes, but only when we know the time is right
@9SK8PBCLibertarian11mos
Iran says it want nuclear power to provide energy. Well test them, offer to help build Thorium reactors. Thorium and its waste can not be used for nuclear weapons.
Yes, but only if they START to develop nuclear weapons because we don’t wants to start a war if they already have them it could be dangerous.
No, and we have given up the right to demand anything from them.
@9SBQPN4Republican11mos
No, Iran is a sovereign country, but we should defend US interest vigorously and build a more robust coalition as a regional opposition.
@9S9XPPLIndependent11mos
If they engage in a large hostile act then we must act as if it was a act of war
No. Only as a last resort
@9S32WFTRepublican11mos
Only if Iran does anything bad to the US
No, there’s no reason why we should go to war with Iran, the government is just making up reasons to go to war with them so that we can steal their oil. There weren’t any weapons of mass destruction before, in Iraq, and there won’t be any now, in Iran.
Only if they pose and immediate and grave threat.
We should stay out of the Iran nuclear deal
We should encourage diplomatic discussions to repair or replace outdated or ineffective policies and come to a mutual agreement before going to war. Always.
@9RM2552Republican12mos
Only as a last result to America's safety.
Yes, but only if they threaten the United States or other countries in the middle east and if they refuse to stop developing nuclear weapons.
But why for the right reason
only if they go to war with Iraq
The US should withdrawal from all foreign nations for economic benefit.
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best. Wait for them to declare war and be ready when it starts, but the US shouldn't throw the first punch.
Yes, but after encouraging Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels, then funding rebellions
If they kill or injure any Americans we should attack them and eliminate there military. All Iran does is fun terror groups that attack the United States and its allies.
No but we should impose the hardest sanctions to change Iran's behaviour
They should use diplomacy and containment first (Abraham accords a positive development) but war must not be off the table.
Maintain encouragement to disarm Iran through diplomatic channels up until the negotiations go nowhere or go south, then only declare war if they develop nuclear weapons.
Only if Iran openly attacks the U.S.
No, if Iran has made an overt declaration of war, we bomb their leaders.
Sanctions are working
No total war. Special forces operations or missile strikes only to combat funding of terrorism and keep Iran from getting nuclear weapons.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
