Try the political quiz

1,555 Replies

@B4N64VTSocialist from Kansas answered…1 day

@B4MKZTSLibertarian from New Hampshire answered…2 days

Any change to the Supreme Court should be delayed until there is a new Party in control of the Senate. This will prevent the court-packing plans that Democrats seem so fond of when it doesn't go their way.

@B4HJFK8Democrat from Texas answered…2wks

Yes they should reform the term limit to be shorter and have an age limit of 55 years old.

@B4G8ZRDGreen from New York answered…2wks

@B47QR6RDemocrat from Georgia answered…1mo

Yes, the whole judiciary system should be reformed, increasing seats and imposing term limits should only be the beginning.

@B45C97HPeace and Freedom from Pennsylvania answered…1mo

Yes, reform and have judges be approved by the people and the congress

@cwa90Libertarian from Pennsylvania answered…2mos

Yes, but only if the new seats are strictly distributed to the winners of the next several presidential elections and not just the current president.

@mathomas156Constitution from Virginia answered…2mos

No. I believe Congress should limit the federal judiciary to just the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

@B3KZ5X3Constitution from Illinois answered…2mos

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized. reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

@B3KFGYYDemocrat from Illinois answered…2mos

Add term limits to the supreme court, and have justices be appointed by an independent committee as apposed to the president.

@B3JRWM7Libertarian from Ohio answered…2mos

@B3GRSHMDemocrat from California answered…2mos

yes, reform to include more seats and impose of term limit when the majority of the US population wants them to resign

@B3DHF75Democrat from Texas answered…2mos

Yes, include an age cap, term limits, add seats, and add an experience check. This way the Supreme Court would be filled with more in touch justices which have a ton of experience working for the department of Justice

@B2VS7DGSocialist from Texas answered…3mos

All elected and nominated position should have a limit of 2, 4 year terms

@B2QFKBWGreen from North Carolina answered…4mos

No, but it should be easier to remove a justice from office.

@B2GY2JXConstitution from Pennsylvania answered…4mos

Abolish the Supreme Court and give power back to the local courts.

@B28MMF3Peace and Freedom from Georgia answered…4mos

No, but reform the Supreme Court to be elected by popular vote for a fixed term

@B23XMK5Republican from Illinois answered…5mos

No, packing the courts simply would result in more packing when the other party gets the POTUS and Senate

@B2KHCLKPeace and Freedom from Colorado answered…4mos

No term limits, but there should be a mandatory retirement age.

@9XPPW69Independent from Mississippi answered…8mos

@9XKMGNVWomen’s Equality from Michigan answered…9mos

I don't feel it should as it could throw off the balance of things and could implement longer processes and could possibly upset the people more.

@9XHBYZ5Constitution from Tennessee answered…9mos

@9XF9YSNGreen from Oregon answered…9mos

@9X2M3M8Peace and Freedom from North Carolina answered…9mos

@9W6MKB8Veteran from Florida answered…10mos

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power and the Supreme Court should no be politicized.

@9VZP5FYLibertarian from Texas answered…10mos

No then people would have to pay for more retired members of the Supreme Court

@9VY7N9MDemocrat from Georgia answered…11mos

Yes, and should reform the Supreme Court into a electoral system and allow citizens of the United States decide who shall serve in the Supreme Court

@9VVHKVVSocialist from Washington answered…11mos

Yes, but only reform to impose 6 year term limits on justices with option of having them reappointed or replaced. Same policy would apply to all Federal judicial benches.

@9VD8BCSSocialist from West Virginia answered…1yr

We should reform it, but including more seats or imposing term limits are not solutions.

@9V4CKNHProgressive from California answered…1yr

Yes and it should be 3 conservative judges 3 liberal judges and 2 independent judges and term limits

@9TPBHHJLibertarian from California answered…1yr

@9TN4YCPGreen from Utah answered…1yr

Senate approvals/rejections should be subject to a deadline, after which the nominee automatically enters office.

@9TG8STJWomen’s Equality from Pennsylvania answered…1yr

No and Abolish the Supreme Court and give power back to local courts.

@9TG5YTMAmerican from Florida answered…1yr

Term limits only, but only on newly appointed justices. This prevents political motives for imposing term limits. Term limits for Congress are way overdue as well.

@9TDVT4FDemocrat from Wisconsin answered…1yr

The Supreme Court should be reformed so justices cannot be appointed by the president.

@Solidarity-PartyLibertarianfrom New York  answered…1yr

Yes, but only reform to become an elected office and include more seats

@9T33VK4Green from Washington answered…1yr

The Supreme Court should only be reformed to have a fixed number of seats.

@9SV47FBWorking Family from Florida answered…1yr

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would be upset the balance of power and the Supreme Court should not be politicized.


The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart...