Try the political quiz

1,076 Replies

@9ZJ5WPSRepublican from Michigan answered…4 days

Yes, but other countries should be pressured to increase their funding.

@johndroca2020Democrat from New York answered…2wks

Yes, but we should work to see that we are not taking advantage of in the amount of aid given to NATO.

@9Z4WJ8TDemocrat from California answered…1mo

Yes, but we should hold members accountable to the 2% GDP spending mandate

@9YYTXQHLibertarian from Washington answered…1mo

@9YTRVCQVeteran from Illinois answered…2mos

Yes but make other countries increase their financial contributions

@9YC9PJ6Constitution from Michigan answered…2mos

Yes, under the condition that every other country involved puts their fair share into it as well.

@9R4ZQX8Reform from Hawaii answered…1yr

Yes, but only on the condition that the other member states are required to maintain their budget quotas and armament preparation. The United States should no longer be the primary armer and cash cow for the alliance.

@9JS9KKGLibertarian from Iowa answered…1yr

Yes, but the United States should not be responsible for funding 50% or more of NATO's operating budget.

@9N9CVQ3Constitution from Pennsylvania answered…1yr

Yes, but we need to remove members that do not have NATO's best interests in mind or those nations that are not true allies (e.g. Turkey).

@9Y74F7XPeace and Freedom from Louisiana answered…3mos

yes, but other countries should increase their contributions

@9Y4HLS6Independent from Virginia answered…3mos

Yes, but the other countries should support proportionally to what we support.

@9XZQQP5Veteran from Idaho answered…3mos

Yes, but the U.S should push the other countries to militarize more.

@9XRVCY8Green from Iowa answered…3mos

@9XMGYQ8Republican from Texas answered…3mos

Yes and we need to take out gangs and cartels in the western hemisphere

@9XKGHNBTranshumanist from Texas answered…3mos

Yes and we need to take out gangs and cartels in the western hemisphere

@9G4NJKBSocialist from New York answered…1yr

Like I said, I'm more concerned about our own domestic problems.

@9FZ27Z9Democrat from New Jersey answered…1yr

US should maintain an international presence in all peacekeeping

@9FSCDFWConstitution from Iowa answered…1yr

Yes, but work on empowering NATO allies to be more involved in their specific regions.

@9FHJKC4Veteran from Florida answered…1yr

Yes but we should reduce our physical presence and our financial burden.

@9FGNLXYAmerican Solidarity from Ohio answered…1yr

Yes, but other NATO allies must increase their contributions.

@9XG4HLMSocialist from New York answered…4mos

Regardless we should pursue an anti-imperialist and anti-interventionist foreign policy

@9X9ZT4YAmerican Solidarity from New Jersey answered…4mos

Yes, but if other countries do not increase their financial contributions then the U.S. needs to leave.

@9X9SFHLDemocrat from Michigan answered…4mos

Yes, and we should create a global alliance to replace NATO.

@9X9D54CRepublican from South Carolina answered…4mos

yes but only if fellow nations meet the minimum requirements for membership which are currently only met by the U.S. the U.K. and Estonia

@9WT3HBPWomen’s Equality from South Carolina answered…4mos

Yes, but decrease financial support of other countries’ conflicts

@9WHZFLDDemocrat from Alabama answered…4mos

Yes, but encourage other member nations to contribute more.

@9Q6D8VKRepublican from Texas answered…1yr

@9PWHGPMPeace and Freedom from Arkansas answered…1yr

No opinion. I am not educated well enough on the topic to form an opinion.

@9PTVZ5RWomen’s Equalityfrom Maine  answered…1yr

@9PSKN9NRepublican from Minnesota answered…1yr

Yes, but other members states need to comply with the Treaty

@9PNTXZ8Veteran from Colorado answered…1yr

Yes, but NATO should be restructured and all parties should have an equal financial burden. Nato should provide aid to nations in need.

@9PC7T4WTranshumanistfrom Vermont  answered…1yr

Yes, but other countries should meet their funding obligations.

@9N9BN7ZDemocrat from Pennsylvania answered…1yr

Yes, it is an important alliance network that balances against threats to American hegemony

@9MP2TGVVeteran from Indiana answered…1yr

@9K85PPTVeteran from Colorado answered…1yr

@9JFHCJPTranshumanist from Texas answered…1yr

@9H7DT2BWomen’s Equality from Missouri answered…1yr

@9H6NT9KSocialist from Ohio answered…1yr

Yes, however, NATO should deter its efforts from stopping Russian influence and intervention in the Middle East to instead focusing on the growing economic and political power, authoritarianism, and policies of ethnic genocide of China

@9GZPJHXLibertarian from North Carolina answered…1yr

Yes, but this should be put to a public referendum every 10 years.

@Emma-HuartLibertarian from Illinois answered…1yr

@9GFXBLCGreen from Oregon answered…1yr

@Joe-MadayIndependent from Washington answered…1yr

Yes, but other member states should live up the pact agreed to by member nations regarding percentage of GDP spending on military.

@9FDV39HVeteran from Kentucky answered…1yr

Certainly, however NATO is obsolete to a certain extent and requires reform.

@9F9YR6RIndependent from Ohio answered…1yr

Yes, but NATO should pay there fair share and not make deals with the enemy. For instance Germany getting oil from Russia.

@9VXNN25Constitution from Indiana answered…5mos

@9VR4WD2Socialist from Illinois answered…6mos

Yes, but NATO should be reformed with all countries paying their share and less tolerance to Turkish agression


The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart...