In January 2014, 102 measles cases linked to an outbreak at Disneyland were reported in 14 states. The outbreak alarmed the CDC, which declared the disease eliminated in the U.S. in the year 2000. Many health officials have tied the outbreak to the rising number of unvaccinated children under the age of 12. Proponents of a mandate argue that vaccines are necessary in order to insure herd immunity against preventable diseases. Herd immunity protects people who are unable to get vaccines due to their age or health condition. Opponents of a mandate believe the government should not be able to decide which vaccines their children should receive. Some opponents also believe there is a link between vaccinations and autism and vaccinating their children will have destructive consequences on their early childhood development.
The government should present the facts. Allowing its citizens to choose to have there children vaccinated. You still do not know what Moderna does to a child.
That should be the patients choice not the governments
No it should be up to the parents of the child
No, If we learn anything from history, Children are possibly can bounce back from illness as long they have ingest Vitamin C or resources like natural ingestion of fruits and vegetables in their diet they can survive the worst situations. Vaccination measures just makes children weaken their immune systems, if children want to do the risk without homework its their choice.
it’s up to the parents not the government
The ability to vaccine a child should be up to the parents and the child itself if there old enough to comply and share their opinion
Parent should get to decide and not be punished for their decision.
This should be a family choice/personal choice
No. Mandatory vaccinations are unconstitutional.
Should be the Parents dissension
@B4K7BJWConstitution2 days
No, only if it is a real vaccine.
@B4K223KRepublican2 days
Yes, only for childhood diseases the government knows they can eliminate; not the COVID-19 vaccine
Yes, and hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children if their own children are unvaccinated.
No, Parents should decide since it’s their children unless the public schools require unless they give the school good reasoning for exemption.
Yes, but only when the vaccine is effective and the disease directly impacts the target population (chicken pox and meningitis, for example)
No, but for diseases that are highly deadly. And still only decided at state level.
No, that should be a choice of the children and their families not mandatory just advised and suggested.
Yes, but if can't don't take the parent a cananbl.
yes, but not for those who are immune compromised
Yes, but with exceptions for those who have medical issues that prevent them from getting vaccinated.
Provided these vaccinations do not include experimental compounds administered under a supposed EUA.
You shouldn´t take it if you dont want to.
yes, but only for deadly diseases, and with the exception of religions that don't allow vaccines
No, but inform parents on why they should get vaccinated and assure them with irrefutable science that their concerns are not true.
shouldn’t be up to the government for bodily autonomy in any case
I believe that it should be theirs or their parents' choice.
Normal Vaccines, but not COVID.
yes, If there will be no damage to the child and the parents agree with it
Yes, but only for vaccines that are FDA approved with ample long-term testing and publically-available data (eg: MMR). Not for EUA vaccines.
I dont but also do agree i feel like it’s important to keep kids safe but at the same time i think that if a kid has a wrong reaction to the vaccine then what ?
Yes, but this should be decided on the parents.
No it shouldn't be a requirement, every parent has the right to refuse to want to put an unknown vaccine in their child, but if it was proven with research that it is 100% safe then yes.
Have a finite amount of non-medical exemptions that is enough to still maintain herd immunity
This is the parents choose if they don’t want there child vaccinated then they don’t if there are places you must go that require you to be vaccinated then that’s there loss
it shouldn't be required, but there should be a system in place to decide what is best for each child, rather than it being solely up to the parent.
Yes unless the child is immune compromised
Depends on the disease/illness. For things like polio? Yes. For things like the flu? No.
Only certain diseases but others, parents should decide.
Not in the case of Covid or an untested vaccine 💉but if children are involved and the vaccines have undergone proper testing then it should be required for non-adults.
3 of these i agree with
Yes, but only with time-tested and safe vaccines.
Depending on what the vaccine is and how well tested it is and how long it took for the vaccine to come out.
No, it shouldn't be required but when the family decides to get vaccinated for it, it should be free for a one time vaccine.
Yes, but only after it has been proven that the vaccine will prevent you from actually getting the contagious disease and also that it will keep you from dying from it.
It should be parents decision.
no, because it is the kids and family's choice.
Yes, but only for certain vaccines like Polio.
If the vaccine has been around for long enough
It shouldn't be required but should be highly advised and only admitted with consent.
it the parents choice to get vaccinated
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...