Try the political quiz

37.5k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...7yrs7Y

No

 @9FJFF7F from California agreed…6mos6MO

Doing whatever means necessary can mean using your allies for your countries benefit. At the end of the day, is it worth it?

 @9FFHB8VLibertarian from Colorado disagreed…6mos6MO

Whilst in war, if something is to happen like a threat made or another bombing on American soil, there is no time to lolli gag around we must do something to defend our nation.

 @9F74MH8 from Texas disagreed…6mos6MO

Is see both ways yes the president should have the power to start wars but if it’s something not crazy serious right at this moment then go through Congress

 @9F89MMP from Florida disagreed…6mos6MO

When the country is under attack you have few minutes to make a decision to fight back.it's in the presidents best interest to act quickly and not wait for congress.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...7yrs7Y

Yes

 @9F89MMP from Florida agreed…6mos6MO

If we're being bombed or damage to infrastructure like 911 I'm sure you don't want to wait for congress.You want to defend yourself.

 @9F74FXSDemocrat from Texas disagreed…6mos6MO

The United States is not a monarchy. One man should not have the power to rob our nation’s cradles to feed the dogs of war.

 @9FBMC26 from California agreed…6mos6MO

while the principle of congressional approval for military conflicts is essential for democratic oversight, opponents argue that it must be balanced with the need for timely and effective responses to emerging threats, especially when classified information and specialized knowledge are involved. The debate centers on finding the right balance between preserving democratic principles and ensuring national security.

 @9F9W9N3 from Pennsylvania disagreed…6mos6MO

If Yes, what about a decision a president will make that could jeopardize the safety of Americans by the possible breakout of war?

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...7yrs7Y

No, Congress should approve all military conflicts

 @9FPVSQJ from Idaho disagreed…6mos6MO

It is not congress's job to be the chief in command, and all decisions about the military themselves should be left the the president.

 @9FBMC26 from California disagreed…6mos6MO

congressional approval for military conflicts emphasizes democratic principles and oversight, opponents argue that it may not always be practical or in the best interest of national security, particularly in emergency situations or those requiring a swift response.

 @8GQ3BHZ from Virginia commented…2mos2MO

Congress has given the President to use war powers through the War Powers Resolution.

 @9FP68FWdisagreed…6mos6MO

Requiring congressional approval would put our troops at risk. certain actions should be kept highly confidential and under the purview of the president

 @9F9GR5L from Florida disagreed…6mos6MO

I think the President, should have a little more lead-way to deploy military assests especially in times of conflict.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...7yrs7Y

Yes, we must use whatever means necessary to prevent another terrorist attack

 @9FLDBB4  from Georgia disagreed…6mos6MO

Top Disagreement

We should ensure that the rights outlined by the constitution and the powers given to the government are not misused and inadvertently trampling the constitution it wishes to protect.

 @9FKZG9X from California disagreed…6mos6MO

We must do everything in our power to keep innocent citizens alive while preventing terrorist attacks

 @9FLN36G from California disagreed…6mos6MO

we shouldn't get our selves into international affairs and use whatever cuz that means we can nuke someone again

 @95MVCYB from Texas disagreed…1yr1Y

 @9JZH4LX from Michigan answered…1mo1MO

Yes, and in theory, as the most powerful person in the nation, the President can do whatever they want without anybody else’s approval

 @9GK257PDemocrat from North Carolina answered…5mos5MO

Yes, but only in emergencies when an instant response is needed. Such operations shouldn’t last beyond 30 days without congressional authorization

 @9GJ79J6 from Virginia answered…5mos5MO

Man, don't ask me this. I don't even know how the government works. I'm practically an anarchist dude.

 @9B8YZH2Republican from Michigan answered…11mos11MO

Yes, But only against specific terrorist organizations such as al-qeada and isis in response to a terrorist attack against Americans. He should be required to notify and inform congress, and congress should have the ability to recall troops.

 @8DFLY6Z from Kentucky answered…3yrs3Y

 @9FC9JN6 from Illinois answered…6mos6MO

Yes and no, congress should have a say in some conflicts, only in the extreme should the president beable to authorize without congressional approval.

 @WearyS0cialJustic3Libertarian from South Carolina disagreed…6mos6MO

Interesting perspective you've got there, but let's consider this: The U.S. Constitution vests Congress with the power to declare war. It's not about some conflicts or extreme situations. It's about preserving the balance of power and preventing unilateral decisions that could plunge our nation into war. Remember Vietnam? It started as a limited engagement but escalated into a full-blown conflict with huge costs.

Now, how would you propose the line between 'extreme situations' and 'some conflicts' be drawn to prevent such a scenario from repeating?

 @9D6PL8H from Arizona answered…7mos7MO

Depending on the situation and president

 @PacifiedHumanRightsRepublican from Oklahoma asked…7mos7MO

Could you elaborate on what kind of situation and attributes of a President would justify such a decision without needing Congressional approval?

 @9DBXVBM from Idaho answered…7mos7MO

 @9JK3GFF  from Illinois answered…2mos2MO

It depends on the severity of the situation, and there should be a series of actions for whether or not we head into a conflict, but at the same time depending on how immediate the issue is a quick forceful action is needed.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...