Try the political quiz

15.5k Replies

@B4KJWHFConstitution from California answered…1 day

@B4K4WSXDemocrat from South Carolina answered…2 days

No, they should be captured and given a fair trial. Emphasis on fair and just trial because the justice system can be corrupt.

@9MS5LC2Transhumanist from Indiana answered…2yrs

@9MPSYYFRepublican from Tennessee answered…2yrs

Yes, only if their is undeniable evidence that the people in question have/ or are planning to attack any country belonging to unied nations

@9MNVYZNDemocrat from New Jersey answered…2yrs

The U.S. should not assassinate suspected terrorists in foreign countries without significant evidence or confirmation that they are a terrorist, planning to attack or have attacked before.

@9MNRFB4Republican from New York answered…2yrs

The terrorists should be captured and given a fair trial, but if for whatever reason capture is impossible then they should be assassinated.

@9MNGNS5Democrat from Massachusetts answered…2yrs

yes and no because if they have no evidence then leave them alone but yes talk to the leader about it and sort things out.

@9MNCZC3Women’s Equalityfrom Virgin Islands  answered…2yrs

I think they should go through more security and forms just in case before they enter the USA.

@9MNBTFPRepublican from Virginia answered…2yrs

@9MMVMVTVeteran from Idaho answered…2yrs

We should first try to capture them and give them a fair trial, but if that doesn’t work that is when we should assassinate them

@9MM6BCNWorking Family from Texas answered…2yrs

No, but they should be turned over by their government to the use to be tried for their crimes. The evidence process should be thoroughly reviewed by the nation and only provided fair public lawyers

@9MM5TB6Peace and Freedom from California answered…2yrs

No, we shouldn’t get involved in a foreign countries problem. Let them deal with that.

@9MM3V55Women’s Equality from Illinois answered…2yrs

Only if there's undeniable evidence they are planning an attack on our country and or have evidence they have committed an attack against our county.

@9MLNQ8XPeace and Freedom from Alabama answered…2yrs

@9MLDJ2RVeteran from Kansas answered…2yrs

@9MKYDWYAmerican Solidarity from Indiana answered…2yrs

capture and interrogate for 50 days, if something happens they are free to go, but would be on extreme surveillance for another 50 days.

@9MKX9SDConstitutionfrom Maine  answered…2yrs

If they represent a significant and imminent threat to the US or US allies.

@9MKSNYQWomen’s Equality from South Carolina answered…2yrs

No, but if they are planning to or have committed an attack against the the country they should be captured and given fair trial.

@9MKRYPWDemocrat from Virginia answered…2yrs

Yes but only if they have planned or committed an act of violence to our country

@9MKQ895Veteran from California answered…2yrs

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country. If not, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead if possible. If not possible, the decision to assassinate is in the hands of those in charge of the operation.

@9MKMNWSRepublican from Mississippi answered…2yrs

Yes if there is undeniable evidence that they ARE and SUCCESSFULLY going to attack our country

@9MKG8XRGreen from Texas answered…2yrs

@9MKBGZVDemocrat from New York answered…2yrs

@9MJRQMNWomen’s Equality from Montana answered…2yrs

yes but only if there is evidence that they are a terrorist and planning to kill or attack us.

@9MJHM9MWomen’s Equality from Hawaii answered…2yrs

Yes,but only if they have attacked or planned an attack on a country or group. Unless they really need to interrogate them.

@9MJGJFRWomen’s Equality from Indiana answered…2yrs

@9MJDGNQWomen’s Equality from Arizona answered…2yrs

If there is reasonable evidence the government should check with the government that the person belongs to and then go from there.

@9MJDFCYPeace and Freedom from Kentucky answered…2yrs

They should capture them question them and see if there is more and then if all is true and undeiable things inprison in ight authority prisons or assonate

@9MJBJHHPeace and Freedom from Missouri answered…2yrs

They should be brought in: only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning an attack on our country they should get a fair trial to determine a punishment

@9MJ7DC8Working Family from Virginia answered…2yrs

I feel the 1st priority should be capture and retrieval and if that is not possible for one reason or another then it should be assassinate.

@9MJ66YLWomen’s Equality from Pennsylvania answered…2yrs

No if they don´t truly know if that´s the case they shouldn´t go around killing innocent people if they do not have evidence of some sort.

@9MHS4QTDemocrat from Maryland answered…2yrs

@9MHL8JWTranshumanist from Texas answered…2yrs

They should assassinate only if there is evidence and they cannot capture the terrorist. If not, capture, interrogate and imprison

@9MHK2NSWorking Family from Massachusetts answered…2yrs

yes if there is provable evidence that they will cause harm

@9MHDK6QRepublican from New York answered…2yrs

Yes if there is undeniable evidence that they are planning to attack, innocent people, our country, or one of our allies.

@9MH8NTSConstitution from North Dakota answered…2yrs

If they are a threat to our country and our allies then yes

@9MGW8BYAmerican Solidarity from Arizona answered…2yrs

@9MGTC89Democrat from California answered…2yrs

Yes, we should if they are going to hurt us or our allies, but we should get the other countries approval.

@9MGRM8QIndependent from California answered…2yrs

@9MFZQ33Transhumanist from Massachusetts answered…2yrs

Yes but only if there is evidence that they are planning to or have done an attack against a civilian population in any country or an ambush attack on the US army

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart...