Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9M2KLG4 from West Virginia answered…40mins40m

I agree that Israel needs to dismantle Hamas but I also agree that Israel has shown a lack of wanting to mitigate civili…

 @9M2KCZ6 from Mississippi answered…46mins46m

Unless there is an immediate threat to our national security, we do not need to raise military spending.

 @9M2K6JN from Georgia answered…50mins50m

The government should only stop the production of the f-35 if it does have any new and better benefits than what we have…

 @9M2J8QD from Ohio answered…1hr1H

it depends on how important the information is. If the terrorist knows the location of a bomb in a very public area then…

 @9M2HQMP from Utah answered…1hr1H

Military power should be in the hands of the people and every citizen should be capable of protecting ones self

 @9M2HMR8 from California answered…1hr1H

I think that military spending should be slightly reduced to put money into big problems that our country has.

 @9M2HM56 from Texas answered…2hrs2H

they should decrease it UNTIL the deficit is reduced or until we must prepare for a serious time of war.

 @9M2CMCP from Washington answered…3hrs3H

Yes, since they are human as well and deserve unalienable rights. They should not be given ALL of the same rights as Ame…

 @9M2BQY6 from Utah answered…3hrs3H

I think that there should be a ceasefire, but there are steps that need to be taken to where they aren't retaliated agai…

 @9M2843X from Texas answered…4hrs4H

Our government should respect leaders of other countries but remain neutral towards all. Defend American interests witho…

 @9M26CRT from Pennsylvania answered…5hrs5H

I think that theres a fine line between somone noe having contitutional rights and dehumanizing them

 @9K99V29 from Florida answered…5hrs5H

No, Israel in its existence as an apartheid settler colony is ontologically a threat to international security and its…

 @9M22FKQ from North Carolina answered…7hrs7H

I think not to fully cancel them but make them in smaller quantities to keep taxes down and for the environment as not m…

 @9LZW386 from Florida answered…10hrs10H

Yes if it doesn’t jeopardize bordering countries and other nato member’s safety and they can contribute an appropriate…

 @9LZW386 from Florida answered…10hrs10H

Yes. But should not be abusing this power. There should be concrete proof there’s a threat needing to be addressed

 @9LZW386 from Florida answered…10hrs10H

Yes but all developed nations in nato should be contributing their fair share of resources and funds

 @9LZW386 from Florida answered…10hrs10H

No, it is not our responsibility. Especially when it’s a country with one of the most advanced military and intelligence…

 @9LZRD5N from Montana answered…16hrs16H

Yes but we should be focused on topic centered more around fixing conflicts rather than causing them.

 @9LZQLBF from California answered…17hrs17H

No, for the U.N has not don anything to help it citizens as well as us but its far more better if the U.S allies with th…

 @9LZQ7MQ from Florida answered…17hrs17H

Yes, unless such arms sales are necessary to their sovereign integrity, in which case arms sales could be negotiated to…

 @9LZQ7MQ from Florida answered…17hrs17H

Yes, a two-state solution is the only realistic route to peace. Palestine should be required to combat terrorist groups…

 @9LZQ7MQ from Florida answered…17hrs17H

Increase, but only when such countries pass agreements into law to give the United States certain privileges in return

 @9LZP5W8 from Nevada answered…18hrs18H

Yes, it is up to private companies who make weapons to decide who they do business with. The Government doesn't sell wea…

 @9LZP5W8 from Nevada answered…18hrs18H

Decrease, along with a rational analysis of actual US interests and an accounting of what that would cost.

 @9LZMWJL from Arkansas answered…19hrs19H

No, the military would have no right without a congressional declaration of war, and , even still, should not kill on th…