Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9N5SN54 from Michigan answered…1hr1H

It should be appropriate to national goals, part of a holistic & zero based budget plan and cognizant of the need to dec…

 @9N5R33W from Kentucky answered…2hrs2H

US companies should be allowed to sell whatever they want to foreign companies. The US government should not be involved

 @9N5QBQ7 from Oklahoma answered…3hrs3H

Dissolve both countries and form a new state, both are a mistake on this earth left behind by the British and both are a…

 @9N5PWJL from Florida answered…3hrs3H

Instead of reducing our defense, it is smarter to reduce our trade with them. They are locked into the same military def…

 @9N5PWJL from Florida answered…3hrs3H

We really are being hypocrites by not having trade embargoes with Vietnam, China, Russia, Venezuela, etc… Why don’t we…

 @9N5PWJL from Florida answered…3hrs3H

Being in the United Nations gives us a reason to be engaged in the global dialogue and engaged, diplomatically, with oth…

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian from South Carolina answered…5hrs5H

Neither Israel nor Palestine currently supports a two-state solution, which is the important matter. While outside parti…

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian from South Carolina answered…5hrs5H

Ultimately, while the US government can, and should, encourage the cessation of hostilities on both sides, this is ultim…

 @9N5F9BF from Georgia answered…6hrs6H

There would have to be a pretty extreme reason to do it but if there was that reason I would say yes.

 @9N5F9BF from Georgia answered…6hrs6H

We need to make them do the right thing or hinder their ability to continue to do the wrong thing while maintaining the…

 @9N5CK43 from Maryland answered…7hrs7H

India opposes us on most foreign policy questions and mass murders its minorities. We shoudl support the freedom moveme…

 @9N5299Q from Alabama answered…9hrs9H

Forcing a two-state solution has caused much of the crisis. The US has no business dictating such things.

 @9N4YRV3 from Tennessee answered…9hrs9H

We have been wrong about suspected terrorists before, and torture has been proven not to work. While they are not U.S. c…

 @9N4X39S from Nevada answered…9hrs9H

No, and weapons should only be sold to countries we are directly allied with such as NATO and Japan.

 @9N4X39S from Nevada answered…9hrs9H

No, and retire extraneous, less capable platforms like the F-16 and F-18 in favor of more F-35s, as well as restarting F…

 @9N4X39S from Nevada answered…9hrs9H

Yes, but encourage allies to take larger roles in the alliance and spend more of their GDP on Defense.

 @9N4WQ8T from New York answered…9hrs9H

should increase spending a Little but should be very careful and thourough with where the money goes

 @9N4V59J from Texas answered…10hrs10H

increases domestically, decrease foreign except key places for defense purpose, regulate and/or military industrial comp…

agree

 @75KRFBJ from Nebraska answered…10hrs10H

I sympathize with the citizens who are being dragged into the conflict by two corrupt administrations bent on destroying…

 @9N4PX94 from Maryland answered…11hrs11H

Yes. But also treat them as combatants and not criminals. So every trial is a war crimes military tribunal.

 @db from Mississippi answered…11hrs11H

If we prosper and have a surplus, increase for defense/peace through strength causes. For now pull out of foreign wars a…

 @9N4KJ9Cfrom Montana  answered…12hrs12H

Yes, they should have the ability to have a fair trial. Though they are horrible, they are subject to the choice of our…

 @9N4KCZKfrom Maine  answered…12hrs12H

I feel an increase could be helpful but not so much that other places for our deficit spending gets changed too heavily

 @9N4DF4T from New Hampshire answered…13hrs13H

To an extent, yes. If a country doesn't have the funds for there military, yes! If a country is refusing to put money to…