Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9NNGDNZ from Maryland answered…24mins24m

Only for individuals with incomes lower than $80,000 per annum or couples with $120,000 per annum, and only for vehicles…

 @9NN9DN6 from Utah answered…2hrs2H

Yes, but only if it actually helps with carbon emissions. Unlike electric vehicles that actually cause far more damage…

 @9NMQZ5Q from Michigan answered…10hrs10H

Government should explore geoengineering strategies to keep options open, but should prioritize prevention of global war…

 @9NMPV8B from Arizona answered…11hrs11H

Yes but as long as they make those companies pay for damages they have caused if they have been found lying to the publi…

 @9NMP6K8 from Texas answered…12hrs12H

No, the government should focus on public transportation while private companies compete to build the best network

 @9NMLQ35 from New York answered…14hrs14H

Yes, it is unethical, but there is also a question of the efficiency of possible voluntary human testing

 @9NLZLPX from North Carolina answered…21hrs21H

No, phase them out over a set period instead to avoid individual hardship. Also increase consumer incentives to recycle…

 @9NLZLPX from North Carolina answered…21hrs21H

Yes, but new regulations should be aimed at large corporate polluters who are most responsible for the crisis rather tha…

 @9NLZF63 from New York answered…21hrs21H

Only if there is no other option of safely testing a medical device before going to human clinical trails

 @9NLVLK4 from New York answered…23hrs23H

other countries contribute to the majority of climate change. United States already has regulations and does good.

 @9NLT7V5 from Michigan answered…23hrs23H

Yes, and increase fines and oversight of oil/pipeline companies in the case of spillage or accident.