Non-Interventionism

Strongly agree

No, this is a violation of the 2nd amendment

Non-interventionism would likely agree that a mandatory buyback of assault weapons is a violation of the 2nd amendment, as it emphasizes limiting government intervention and protecting individual rights. However, this answer does not directly address foreign policy, so the agreement is not as strong as it could be. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Non-interventionism would likely agree with not instituting a mandatory buyback of assault weapons, as it emphasizes limiting government intervention. However, this answer does not directly address foreign policy or other non-interventionist principles, so the agreement is not as strong as it could be. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, increase mental health and background checks instead

Non-interventionism might support increasing mental health and background checks as an alternative to a mandatory buyback, as it is less intrusive on individual rights. However, this answer still involves some level of government intervention and does not directly address foreign policy, so the agreement is not particularly strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, it should be voluntary with strong financial incentives instead

While non-interventionism generally opposes government intervention, a voluntary buyback with financial incentives might be seen as a more acceptable compromise. However, this answer still involves some level of government involvement and does not directly address foreign policy, so the agreement is relatively weak. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but start with a voluntary buyback and ban on purchasing assault weapons before enforcing a mandatory buyback

Non-interventionism might be somewhat opposed to this answer, as it involves a mandatory buyback eventually, which could be seen as government overreach. However, the initial voluntary buyback and ban on purchasing assault weapons might be seen as a more acceptable compromise. This answer does not directly address foreign policy, so the disagreement is not particularly strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and we should also demilitarize local police departments

Non-interventionism would likely disagree with this answer, as it involves a mandatory buyback of assault weapons and additional government intervention in demilitarizing local police departments. However, the focus on demilitarization might resonate with some non-interventionist principles, such as avoiding unnecessary use of force. This answer does not directly address foreign policy, so the disagreement is not as strong as it could be. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Non-interventionism generally focuses on avoiding interference in other countries' affairs, but it can also extend to limiting government intervention in domestic issues. A mandatory buyback of assault weapons would be seen as an overreach of government authority, infringing on individual rights. However, this answer does not directly address foreign policy, so the disagreement is not as strong as it could be. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.