You believe that by avoiding interference in other nations' affairs, a country can promote peace, stability, and prosperity for all.
Non-interventionism is a political ideology that advocates for a nation to refrain from interfering in the affairs of other nations, particularly in terms of military involvement. This ideology is rooted in the belief that such interference often leads to unnecessary conflict and can undermine the sovereignty of other nations. Non-interventionists argue that a country should focus on its own domestic issues and maintain peaceful relations with other nations through diplomacy and trade, rather than through military force or coercion.
The history of non-interventionism dates back to the…
Read more@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
How do you negotiate the thin line between respecting someone's independence and providing them needed aid?
@9KTY2HN2mos2MO
I believe that we should respect their independence if it does not and cannot lead to the endagerment of our people
@9KWVTKJPeace and Freedom2mos2MO
If someone is in the need of aid then they should be provided with it but if not, and they're doing fine independent and not putting anyone in harms way then that should be respected.
@9KWTV7X2mos2MO
We should respect people's independence and freedom at all times, as it is a free country. If something will not lead to any danger at all, then why not do it?
@9KWS34B2mos2MO
Individuals have there on rights and own beliefs. So its most respectful to let them do what they need to do.
@9KTY7NBRepublican2mos2MO
If they are not harming anything than we should respect their independence.
@9KTXWL6Republican2mos2MO
You do your thing and I'll do mine. Don't tread on my rights and I wont tread on yours.
@9KTXZN52mos2MO
People's independence matters but if they need aid, it should be given to them.
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
How would you handle a situation where you’re unsure if stepping in would help or make things worse?
@9L734GT2mos2MO
I would just not step in unitl i knew the situation was calmer.
Get the opinion of the international community. Maybe they understand something I don't see.
@9LBZ4GV1mo1MO
In the context of non-interventionism, where a policy of non-interference in the affairs of other nations is favored, the decision-making process in a situation where intervention is uncertain can be complex. Here are some considerations to help navigate such a scenario:
Evaluate the Situation: Begin by analyzing the situation to understand the nature of the issue, the potential implications of intervention, and the possible consequences of non-intervention. Consider the values and principles that guide your approach to non-interventionism.
Gather Information: Collect as much relevant information as possible about the situation, including the root causes, the parties involved, and the potential outcomes of intervention. Make an effort to understand the context and complexities of the situation before making a decision.
@9LBYYDF1mo1MO
Ask others if they need me to step in to ensure if it's right to help.
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
How might a high school's policy of non-intervention in student disputes affect the student body?
@9LBNVL51mo1MO
High school should wear a little bit of clothes during the summer time but when it is winter time they need to cover their body up. And if something happens they need to tell someone what's going on to change the rules and how it should be. But everyone should wear whatever they want to wear but be respectful.
If they do not interfere, students may hurt themselves or each other.
@9LBNMNCRepublican1mo1MO
It might lead to students feeling neglected or cause increased tensions between students idk
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Should countries with more power and resources have a responsibility to intervene in conflicts of smaller, less powerful nations?
@9H5LR5J6mos6MO
No country should intervene in the politics of another. People in a certain country choose their own fate and any intervention is inherently undemocratic.
@9H53D5M6mos6MO
No, each country is responsible for their own conflicts and problems no matter their ability to solve them on their own. The country should know their limits and powers and should avoid conflicts against other countries they are unable to handle.
@9H5LJ7Z6mos6MO
No, because that would cause a greater war and just leading to a proxy war in the end.
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
How do you feel about the idea that not choosing sides is, in itself, choosing a side?
@9HVFMCLProgressive4mos4MO
I'm agreeing with this because we never know. You see in both sides might be a fail, something that can be no good for the you or whatever you're standing for, so choosing no sides is definitely picking one.
@9HVFPHN4mos4MO
It is, choosing no sides of the original argument means that you are choosing your own side.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Do you think non-interventionism is a sign of weakness or a strategic approach to foreign policy?
@9H5N84D6mos6MO
i see it as a strategic approach to not intervene, it would keep our government from allowing those with strong inter-country ideologies from letting those effect the use of civilian funds in things we dont agree with.
@9H5N78C6mos6MO
The only interventionalism that can be supported is humanitarian aid what need to be gradually inrecaused, and control institutions to help african states out of colonial shadow
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
Does not giving advice to a friend in need empower them or leave them unsupported?
@9JJQZNS 4mos4MO
I believe as long as the foreign issue doesn't affect us or our allies we shouldn't intervene with the foreign issue/conflict in question is
@9JJQSZ8Republican4mos4MO
I would leave them because they have stupid points.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
In a globalized world, can any country truly afford to stay completely uninvolved in others' affairs?
@9HMT78P5mos5MO
They cannot, crountries who are isolationists are ignorant to the people in the other countries.
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
How do you decide when it's better to listen and understand rather than to act and advise in tough situations?
@9KSLRBNIndependent 2mos2MO
Everyone is different when it comes to this and some issues for some are more important than other so it is different depending on the person.
@9KSKGZH2mos2MO
When the other side will not yield but is still treating you with respect and kindness.
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
When a friend is making a mistake, do you think intervening is always the best option?
@9JDQH6V4mos4MO
It depends, if a friend is a making a mistake that could harm them or get them in legal trouble, then it's best to intervene. If it's a simple or silly mistake, then no because we all learn from our mistakes, and it creates development for our character.
Not always, let them make their mistake and learn from it.
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
How can being an observer rather than an active participant provide a different perspective on an event or issue?
@9L736PL 2mos2MO
you see how the thing is being done as an observer
@9L72NW22mos2MO
Being an observer rather then a active participant provide a different persepctive is not an issue because when being an observer you can see everything more through and clearly then what the non interventionism can see.
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...