Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9N7NRC3 from New York answered…5mins5m

The government should allow the market to determine this, and not position itself as for our against at any level.

 @9N7CFTX from New York answered…3hrs3H

Leave it at the local government level. I believe the majority of school districts already require it.

 @9N73RR7 from Tennessee answered…6hrs6H

Crispr is an abomination. Humans are not meant to be edited or experiment on in this way, or at all.

 @9N6YGZT from Texas answered…7hrs7H

Yes, with respect to actual vaccines for deadly diseases, but no for therapeutics without any longitudinal studies

 @9N6WNH5 from Maryland answered…7hrs7H

I say no because I feel as if over exploring space will then only cause farther problems to be started just because of t…

 @9N6SZYLfrom Maine  answered…8hrs8H

They shouldn't be required by law; but the market should encourage it if it is economically relevant.

 @9N6SWZ3 from North Carolina answered…8hrs8H

yes and no. because yes it is cleaner and renewable we can have nuclear reactor meltdowns or have something like the vid…

 @9N6K8JM from Louisiana answered…11hrs11H

Yes, but only with those companies wishing to take part being required to collectively fund an independent oversight of…

 @9N694LC from North Carolina answered…13hrs13H

Yes, but I feel like there's a lot of other important things the government should worried about other than sending peop…

 @9N694LC from North Carolina answered…13hrs13H

Yeah, but I feel like it shouldn't be a complete replacement if it doesn't end up being all that great.

 @9N5QFF6 from California answered…23hrs23H

Yes, but only for vaccines that have undergone extensive trials in order to account for both long and short-term effects…

 @9N5T2SW from Washington D.C. answered…21hrs21H

if it proves to provide no detrimental health defects and provides the standard nutrients as natural meat