Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9N5QFF6 from California answered…8hrs8H

Yes, but only for vaccines that have undergone extensive trials in order to account for both long and short-term effects…

 @9N5G9NW from California answered…12hrs12H

yes and No because if you don't have health problems then that's fine if your parents let you but if you have a medical…

 @9N4W62T from Rhode Island answered…15hrs15H

You can choose not to vaccinate your children but there is a $999,000,000,000,000,000,000 fee per month per child you ha…

 @9N5T2SW from Washington D.C. answered…6hrs6H

if it proves to provide no detrimental health defects and provides the standard nutrients as natural meat

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian from South Carolina answered…10hrs10H

No. While I acknowledge the literature that demonstrates its effectiveness, it represents a backdoor tax.

 @9N5JXC9 from Massachusetts answered…11hrs11H

If it can compete on the market without subsidy or regulation again Brady it's competitors, then so be it.

 @9N552QS from Connecticut answered…13hrs13H

Yes, but only with careful regulation & enforcement far in excess of animal-grown meat requirements, and only for the lo…

 @9N4W62T from Rhode Island answered…15hrs15H

With strict regulations and HARSH penalties including a $999,000,000,000,000,000,000 fine per violation.

 @db from Mississippi answered…17hrs17H

It should be allowed just like raw milk, drugs, etc. the free market should decide, and hopefully bankrupt it.

 @9N4HDRQ from Alabama answered…18hrs18H

More studies need to be done on this before commercialization - how will this effect carbon emissions? how will this eff…

 @9N3V3QC from Florida answered…22hrs22H

More research is required, but to fight world hunger it’s a good idea but could be devastating for farmers and other foo…