Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9NTW75T from Indiana answered…1hr1H

Only for vaccinations that have been proven to be effective over years of time and not ones that are made hastily

 @9NTH43Q from North Carolina answered…5hrs5H

Yes, but only for a temporary period with adequate regulation as we shift to investing in cleaner and more sustainable e…

 @9NTFVLBfrom Maine  answered…5hrs5H

Yes, however our vaccines need to be held to a higher standard of quality control and more tests about adverse effects

 @9NSPTCM from Colorado answered…18hrs18H

Yes with exemptions for documented religious beliefs and for individuals with documented medical issues

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…23hrs23H

Only for diseases which there is no herd immunity and which are an imminent threat. The world is a dangerous place - we…

 @9NS8J5G from New York answered…23hrs23H

No. But violation of law should permanently put any entity abusing the technology and/or using it unethically out of bu…

 @9J3JP2J from Arizona answered…23hrs23H

No, this reminds me of Shou Tucker from Fullmetal Alchemist. Needs serious limitations and rules if it's to be done.

 @9NTLVYV from California answered…4hrs4H

Yes, but rigorous testing and research should be required. Additionally, there should be a requirement that specifies wh…

 @9NSBDFX from Idaho answered…22hrs22H

Needs to be more testing and it should be labeled ALL our food should be labeled with the health risks.

 @9NSB24N from Florida answered…22hrs22H

Yes, only after extensive testing on animals and humans. A minimum of 20 years of human trials should be required.