Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9NF9B4M from Iowa answered…23mins23m

Yes, and the government should buy-out the patents for important drugs and give everyone the right to produce such drugs…

 @9NF9B4M from Iowa answered…23mins23m

I am too ignorant to give an intelligent answer, but veterans should receive high-quality, government-funded healthcare…

 @9NF7Y8N from California answered…1hr1H

Propaganda has caused serious damage to the citizens faith in science, truth, reality and awareness. Educating the publi…

 @9NDKNSF from Indiana answered…14hrs14H

Yes, within reason. They should be banned in places predominantly designed for kids (such as on kids TV networks like Ni…

 @9NDKNSF from Indiana answered…14hrs14H

Yes, unless they are disabled. You should either actively have a job or be searching for one if you're not disabled or a…

 @9NDDVY2 from Missouri answered…17hrs17H

Not necessarily ban the promotion, but to make healthier food options more available and more affordable.

 @9NDDVY2 from Missouri answered…17hrs17H

Life-saving drugs should NOT have a price and should not be monopolized. It needs to be available for any person(s).

 @9NDDCWV from Illinois answered…18hrs18H

It depends. If the money is used for the elderly or physically disabled then I agree with this. However, I work in Behav…

 @9NDB2PZ from Virginia answered…19hrs19H

Yes, people should work to get benefits, but give them healthcare while they are searching for jobs.

 @9L4Z23B from Pennsylvania answered…19hrs19H

No, as long as individuals have paid premiums for at least 3 months or the pre-existing condition is considered to be li…

 @9L4Z23B from Pennsylvania answered…19hrs19H

More, allow TRICARE to negotiate premiums and out of pocket costs with private doctors and private insurance

 @9ND8RVV from New York answered…19hrs19H

Yes. Requiring companies to cover people with higher likelihood of requiring high-cost services means the insurance comp…

 @9ND4NTQ from California answered…21hrs21H

I support this ONLY for the working poor, not for unemployed. I support this for those who are low income elderly or dis…

 @9ND48XJ from North Carolina answered…21hrs21H

No, a vaccination should never be required as this is a direct infringement on personal and civil liberty.

 @9NCVR3Kfrom Virginia  answered…23hrs23H

Yes, but focus on qualities of care outside of drugs and increase natural coping/solutions for anxiety and depression. P…

 @9NCVR3Kfrom Virginia  answered…23hrs23H

No, it is a constitutional right to allow companies to promote their product. Instead, create counter influence campaign…

 @9NCVR3Kfrom Virginia  answered…23hrs23H

Yes, but increase penalties for people using machinery under influence such as cars. Hold people accountable if an injur…

 @9NCVR3Kfrom Virginia  answered…23hrs23H

No, due to people receiving Medicaid being disabled, but they should require able bodied and mentally capable individual…

 @9NCVR3Kfrom Virginia  answered…23hrs23H

No, if vaccination of even deadlier diseases can be prevented due to “religious reasons” on innocent children, the requi…

 @9NCVR3Kfrom Virginia  answered…23hrs23H

No, each state should decide this issue. Also, increasing vetting so Medicaid goes to people who genuinely need it and n…

 @9NCVR3Kfrom Virginia  answered…23hrs23H

No, but more action should be taking towards companies extorting people from life-saving drugs like insuline.

 @9NCWSJ4 from New York answered…24hrs24H

No, Coronavirus is not considered a pandemic anymore, and people should have the option to choose on getting a vaccine f…