Try the political quiz

5 Replies

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington commented…3mos3MO

Then why did you feel the need to protest me saying that someone had to start talking about dark possibilities? Why did you use Ad Hominem attacks on it as a "conspiracy theory"? If we agree that these things should be examined, then let them be examined without badmouthing those who examine them!

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…3mos3MO

Because the possibility of us killing an ally of a protester is not nearly equivalent to the possibility of someone with a common track record of murder being considered. The situation even doesn’t make too much sense, if they wanted the bill, there’s better ways to get it. I’m saying that considering that possibility as if it’s superior to Putin just being a murderer is false equivalence, even misguided logical reasoning in many ways.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington commented…3mos3MO

I'm not necessarily saying that happened, all I'm saying is that it would be a useless and stupid decision for Putin, who thought evil is very intelligent, to kill Nalvany, therefore we should not assume as much, much less use that unproven theory as a basis for any negative emotions toward Russia we wouldn't already have. Certainly it's no argument for them to pass the 95 billion dollar aid bill that's in Congress right now. This is not misguided logical reasoning – I haven't even assumed anything – all I'm saying is that we need more information and the situation looks highly suspicious. To say as much should not be controversial.

  @lemans3427Republican from California commented…3mos3MO

Navalny was polling at less than 5%. Putin had no reason to kill him.

On the day his death was announced his wife was at a conference with Kamala Harris in Munich.

What a coincidence!

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington commented…3mos3MO

That's what Daniel McAdams was saying on the Liberty Report podcast! If you haven't heard of it, I recommend you try listening to an episode.

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this comment.

Last activeActivity1,502 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias2%Active inPartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown