Try the political quiz

281 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How do you think having the government as the main provider of healthcare would affect your family and you?

 @9HK8TFR from Florida answered…5mos5MO

they must have the benefit of high-quality health care services that are effectively coordinated within a strong public health system.

 @9HK95ZYPeace and Freedom from North Carolina answered…5mos5MO

I think the main affect would be the fact the government can alter the prices whenever their in a bad position

 @9HK8MC6Women’s Equality from Pennsylvania answered…5mos5MO

I think it would be better for me, as my mother can't afford any of my billings to pay for my health care, and I have to take many medications at the age of 17. I have a job but I am not able to afford it either.

 @9HK8PNB from North Carolina answered…5mos5MO

I don't think the government should be involved in healthcare or that we should pay for healthcare it should be free.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How might the general health of the population be impacted if the government was the sole provider of food and controlled diet standards?

 @9KBB923Republican from Pennsylvania answered…2mos2MO

 @9KBBXBG from Missouri answered…2mos2MO

It will be more growth people will be able to n do more things instead of worrying bout bills sand groceries

 @9KBBDRBLibertarian from Nebraska answered…2mos2MO

 @9KBBCCG from Indiana answered…2mos2MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How would you expect public trust to shift if the government provided all-news broadcasting?

 @9L4TPZF from Minnesota answered…1mo1MO

Most people already have their bias, they would only tune in when it was broadcasting a station they preferred

 @8Z5SKCG  from Alabama disagreed…1mo1MO

The federal government should not be allowed to dictate to us what is news and isn't. As we have seen in the last election, the federal government used their authority to censor news that could have potentially been harmful to a candidate. Also, the federal government already has several means of providing the American people, and in larger aspects the world, with public news. With such things as: C-span, NPR, Free Europe, and others. Many of these radios and tv networks fall into the heavy left leaning views, stifling the voices of conservatives. C-Span is the only non-bias news site, that is not watched or loved by anyone. People want bias news, if they didn't it wouldn't exist today. The federal government should withdraw all money from news sites, outside of C-Span, and let private industries and citizens dictate what is news.

 @9L4SX34from Maine answered…1mo1MO

The public might trust it more if their news would come from the government.

 @9L4S6CS from Washington answered…1mo1MO

 @9L4S3DW from Nevada answered…1mo1MO

I don't believe the general public will care much as most news outlets are already biased.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

If the state had a significant role in the music industry, how might that change the variety and content of the music you listen to?

 @88YT2FZ  from California answered…3mos3MO

Music is art, and there is much of art I don’t understand, agree with, or like. However, you cannot control someone’s artistic desires by something as cumbersome and unwieldy as “government”. Specific regulations like “no pornography in public museums” are fine, but a state can’t “take control” over art, let alone music, without smothering it.

 @9JSG47HLibertarian from Virginia answered…3mos3MO

It might be more localized bands or singers. The state would probably only know local artists.

 @9JSF7NV from Illinois answered…3mos3MO

It would be a lot less progressive since opposition of the government or any form of government could be flagged.

 @9JSFBLM from Nevada answered…3mos3MO

it will show a demographics of genres but also division becausde alot of people mix up genres

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

If the government could regulate the tech industry, in what ways do you think your digital privacy and access to information might change?

 @9JC6NPCDemocrat from Texas answered…3mos3MO

 @9JC6N6S from North Carolina answered…3mos3MO

 @9JB4LCHRepublican from Texas answered…3mos3MO

I think the government would regulate our technology use to an extent that we could become isolated from other parts of the world, being oblivious and unaware of global matters.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1mo1MO

Do you think that state control over housing development could positively or negatively affect community cohesion?

 @9LGN4XM from Texas answered…2wks2W

I think it is up to the state to handle housing so yes Dirigisme however a strong role states play in housing, I think it is important.

 @9LGN3GW from Wisconsin answered…2wks2W

 @9LGMXY8 from North Dakota answered…2wks2W

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Can government direction in social media protect users from misinformation or would it infringe on free speech?

 @9KZTQ6K from North Carolina answered…1mo1MO

It would most likely get out of hand and infringe on free speech.

 @9L3FB78Independent from Wisconsin agreed…1mo1MO

What they're doing with Tiktok shows the inability to give a good trial with logical questioning and evidence.

 @9KZTTYC from Michigan answered…1mo1MO

 @9KZTMKC from Michigan answered…1mo1MO

I think it would it would give the wrong message out and confuse all the other people.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

If the government had a significant role in media production, how do you think that would shape public opinion and culture?

 @9HK862D from North Carolina answered…5mos5MO

They already do have a huge role in media production they control the media so its a dumb question.

 @9HK86RC from Massachusetts answered…5mos5MO

it would become an outlet for the government to sway our opinions on social and political issues, therefore allowing the government to control us in a way.

 @9HK84KS from Massachusetts answered…5mos5MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How confident are you that the government could effectively manage and reduce poverty through economic planning?

 @9HK8NLC from Michigan answered…5mos5MO

I feel they have no interest in doing such. It has been proven that the government doesn't care for reducing poverty. Just look at what happend in San Francisco before the world leader meeting.

 @9HK8K7H from Pennsylvania answered…5mos5MO

I don't think that it can reduce poverty, especially now as the population increases.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

What if the government had control over the internet; how do you think this would affect your personal freedom and privacy?

 @9J55RK7 from Kentucky answered…3mos3MO

 @9J4VLM8 from Florida answered…3mos3MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Do you think it's fair for a government to choose how much professionals in various fields should earn?

 @9HV3SW8from Virgin Islands answered…4mos4MO

The government should stay out of a free market system. It can only do harm and butcher an autonomous system.

 @9HV3NVRRepublican from Texas answered…4mos4MO

No, it should be up to the employer to decide that, as long as it is within reason for them to be paid that much.

 @9HV3YKPfrom Florida answered…4mos4MO

I don't think that is fair, as some people have prepared more and have a better background than others, and also there could be unfair treatment to others.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Would you be comfortable with the government having a say in the types of apps and software you can use?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Imagine if your future career was chosen by the government; would that make you feel more secure or limited?

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...