No

I would like someone to be proven a terrorist, not suspected, before assassination. Innocent until proven guilty is the foundation of our justice system.

If they are proven to be a danger to the citizens of the united states, then why wait for people to die before taking action?

We cannot intervene in any foreign nation. Only peace and development for the world, not war and murder.

if we just go assassinate any and all suspected terrorists, we will find ourselves in a problem of eventually killing an innocent civilian.

During the attack at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, in 1999, police could only surrounded the building and didn't go inside. Students were inside with no help or aid and this should be prevented in the future.

We all have natural rights and everyone is human and we shouldn't change the rules of our country for one person.

many people are craeting fake documents and possibly incrimination photos of different people and celebrities.

Foreign assaination in the country have only led to problem,you get rid of one but there always another no matter what.

It should be illegal to murder someone who is suspected of foreign assassination and should be over all illegal to murder someone because your taking someones life for an in the moment choice. Instead just make them serve a long time in jail, if you think about it hurting your child will do nothing but make them turn more bad but putting them in time out will help them think about their bad choices.

the west isn’t the police of the world.

You should kill no one, even if that person killed someone you love. A good revenge would be that they are locked up, and not killed. Otherwise they will not feel guilty and can't feel guilty.

We should not go for foreign assassination, because we might kill foreigners who have no criminal records, be part of a dangerous organization, or more. Meaning if we killed a innocent or member of a dangerous organization, we will end up in bad situations.

Was Castro ever *really* a threat to the US? Really? Enough that we tried to assassinate him over 600 times? Get **** ing real. If Cuba ever tried to invade the US they would be crushed, Castro was never a real threat on his own. We wanted a vassal state to exploit.

there are numerous examples of the US killing foreign leaders in the name of "suppressing terrorism"

Assassination of suspected terrorists should only take place preceding a fair and just trial within the united states. This is what is due to humans and is found within our constitution

the government can use the terrorist assassination to assasinate someone who isnt a terrorist, but simply doesnt go by there ideals

If you vote no, then you agree that you would not like to start any conflicts with foreign countries or states.

Terrorist attack not only the U.S. but our allies, look at Afghanistan, we were there to help those people maintain their country and once we left the Taliban A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION TOOK OVER. We must help our fellow allies not destroy them.

Some opponents of free college argue that the government shouldn't be subsidizing people's degrees in majors that aren't likely to lead to a good job

If we say no to foreign assassination, it’s because we don’t want the US to get in a war with any country.