Electric and hybrid vehicles use electricity and a combination of electricity and fuel, respectively, to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and decrease emissions. Proponents argue that it significantly cuts pollution and advances the transition to renewable energy sources. Opponents argue that it increases vehicle costs, limits consumer choice, and may strain the electric grid.
23% Yes |
77% No |
23% Yes |
77% No |
See how support for each position on “Electric Vehicle Mandates” has changed over time for 402 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Electric Vehicle Mandates” has changed over time for 402 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9NGZJZS5 days5D
Yes, only if the government aids heavily in the purchase of the vehicles
@9NG845V5 days5D
No, however promotion of Electric/Public Transportation/Urban Renewal can be the solution to the current high CO2 rate.
@9NG79VT5 days5D
No, only if the infrastructure is also required to be expanded to accommodate all of the vehicles along the same timeline.
@9NFW3WL5 days5D
Yes, as long as they're as affordable as fuel-based vehicles.
@9NF9B4M6 days6D
No, but drivers who emit carbon emissions should pay a gas tax for the use of the air (which they already do); also, power plants which produce the electricity (such as that used to charge electric cars) by emitting carbon should also pay a tax for the use of the air
@9NCVR3K7 days7D
No, forcing a country with high amount of car owners to have one specific type of car while refusing the acknowledge the damage lithium mining is causing to the environment is negligible.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
