Technocracy

Strongly agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Technocrats would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with their focus on data-driven policies and expert decision-making. Holding manufacturers and dealers liable for negligence allows for a more targeted approach to accountability, ensuring that businesses are held responsible for their actions without placing undue burden on those who follow the law and industry best practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

Technocrats might lean towards not allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as they would likely prioritize data-driven policies and regulations to prevent gun violence rather than focusing on legal action after the fact. However, this score is not strongly positive because technocrats may still see some value in holding businesses accountable in specific cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only dealers

Technocrats might lean towards allowing victims of gun violence to sue dealers, as dealers are closer to the point of sale and may have more direct responsibility for ensuring that firearms are sold legally and responsibly. However, this score is not strongly positive because technocrats would likely still prefer a more data-driven and targeted approach to addressing gun violence, focusing on regulations and policies rather than legal action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Technocrats would likely be neutral on this answer, as they would prefer to focus on data-driven policies and regulations to prevent gun violence rather than legal action. While they might agree that businesses should be held liable for illegal activity, they would likely want to see more specific criteria for determining liability rather than a broad statement about the primary use of a product. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Technocracy is focused on decision-making by technical experts and data-driven policies. While a technocrat might see some merit in holding businesses accountable, they would likely prefer a more nuanced approach that focuses on specific cases of negligence or illegal activity rather than a blanket allowance for suing firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

Technocrats would likely disagree with this answer, as it does not align with their focus on data-driven policies and expert decision-making. Allowing anyone to sue for any reason could lead to a flood of frivolous lawsuits, which would not be an efficient use of resources or an effective way to address the issue of gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.