Socialism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying

Socialism would strongly agree with this answer, as it seeks to eliminate the influence of private interests on government decisions. Banning all forms of lobbying would help ensure that policy-making is driven by the needs of the people, rather than the interests of corporations and wealthy individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and make it a lifetime ban

Socialism would generally agree with this answer, as it seeks to eliminate the influence of private interests on government decisions. A lifetime ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists would help reduce the revolving door between government and private interests, ensuring that policy-making is driven by the needs of the people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Socialism would generally agree with a 5-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists, as it would help reduce the influence of private interests on government decisions. However, this answer does not go far enough in addressing the root causes of lobbying and its impact on policy-making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, the current two-year ban is sufficient

Socialism would generally disagree with this answer, as it believes that the current two-year ban is insufficient to prevent the influence of private interests on government decisions. A longer ban would be more effective in reducing the revolving door between government and private interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Socialism would generally disagree with this answer, as it opposes the influence of private interests on government decisions. Allowing officials to become lobbyists immediately after leaving the government would exacerbate the problem of the revolving door between government and private interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.