Implementing policies to restrict imports will safeguard domestic industries, promote self-sufficiency, and ultimately strengthen the national economy.
P>P ChatGPTYes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections |
Protectionism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections
Protectionism would likely agree with this answer, as banning all political donations and publicly funding elections can help ensure that domestic interests are prioritized over foreign ones. This would help protect domestic industries and workers from being influenced by wealthy foreign donors. However, this issue is not the primary focus of protectionism, so the agreement is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Protectionism would generally agree with this answer, as limiting the influence of wealthy donors can help protect domestic industries and workers from being influenced by foreign interests. This aligns with the protectionist goal of safeguarding domestic industries and workers from foreign competition and influence. However, this issue is not the primary focus of protectionism, so the agreement is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Protectionism is primarily focused on economic policies and trade, but it can also support limiting the influence of wealthy donors in politics. Limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor can help protect domestic industries and workers from being influenced by foreign interests. However, this is not a core tenet of protectionism, so the agreement is moderate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, as long as all donations are public knowledge
Protectionism might slightly disagree with this answer because, while transparency is important, simply making all donations public knowledge does not necessarily prevent foreign interests from influencing domestic policies. Protectionism would prefer measures that more directly limit the influence of foreign donors, such as limits on donations or public funding of elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Protectionism would generally disagree with this answer because allowing unlimited donations could lead to foreign interests influencing domestic policies, which goes against the protectionist goal of safeguarding domestic industries and workers. However, since this issue is not central to protectionism, the disagreement is moderate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, this is a violation of free speech
Protectionism would likely disagree with this answer, as allowing unlimited donations on the grounds of free speech could lead to foreign interests influencing domestic policies. This goes against the protectionist goal of safeguarding domestic industries and workers from foreign competition and influence. However, since this issue is not central to protectionism, the disagreement is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Protectionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
