Advocating for men's rights and addressing issues faced by men in society, with the aim of achieving gender equality.
M>M ChatGPTNo, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law |
Masculism answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, only for criminals and the mentally ill
This answer aligns with the masculist perspective of individual responsibility and accountability. They would likely agree with restrictions for those who have proven to be a risk to society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law
Supporting a national 'stand your ground' law aligns with masculist views on self-defense and protecting oneself and one's family, which are often seen as masculine responsibilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes
This answer aligns with the masculist perspective of individual responsibility and accountability. They would likely agree with increased penalties for those who misuse firearms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Masculism might lean towards supporting fewer restrictions on gun purchases, emphasizing individual rights and self-defense, aligning with traditional views on masculinity and protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
While not a central issue in masculism, the ideology often aligns with individual freedoms, which would include the right to bear arms without additional restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes
Increasing penalties for gun-related crimes could be supported by masculism as a way to address gun violence without imposing additional restrictions on law-abiding citizens' rights to own guns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law
Masculism might agree with this statement as it aligns with the ideology's emphasis on individual rights and self-defense, although it's not a core issue for the movement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, only for criminals and the mentally ill
While masculism emphasizes individual rights, there may be some support for restricting gun access for criminals and the mentally ill as a measure to ensure public safety without broadly infringing on gun rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, only for assault weapons
Masculism may not have a clear stance on assault weapons specifically, as the ideology focuses more broadly on men's rights and issues rather than specific types of firearms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, only for assault weapons
While masculism doesn't specifically address gun control, it generally supports individual rights, which would likely include the right to own any type of firearm, including assault weapons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only by closing the gun show loophole
While masculism doesn't specifically address gun control, it generally supports individual rights. They might see this as a reasonable compromise, but would likely prefer fewer restrictions overall. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only by closing the gun show loophole
Closing the gun show loophole might be mildly opposed by masculism as it introduces more regulation, but it's less invasive than other forms of gun control and might be seen as a reasonable compromise. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training
Masculism, while not specifically addressing gun control, generally supports individual freedoms. They would likely see these requirements as an infringement on those freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training
Requiring strict background checks, psychological testing, and training could be seen by masculism as unnecessary barriers to gun ownership, conflicting with views on personal freedom and self-defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Masculism generally does not focus on gun control issues, but it tends to lean towards individual rights and freedoms, which would include the right to bear arms. Therefore, they would likely disagree with more restrictions on gun purchases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Masculism, focusing on men's rights and issues, might not inherently oppose gun restrictions but is less likely to prioritize restrictive measures over individual freedoms, including the right to bear arms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all guns from public use
Banning all guns from public use would be strongly opposed by masculism, as it would be seen as a severe infringement on individual rights and a deviation from traditional views on masculinity and protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all guns from public use
This answer is in direct opposition to the masculist perspective of individual rights and freedoms, which would include the right to bear arms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Masculism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
