Keynesianism

Slightly agree

No, most citizens couldn’t even pass a citizenship test

While not a central issue for Keynesianism, some Keynesians may argue that citizenship tests are not necessary for economic growth and could even be counterproductive if they create barriers to immigration. The argument that most citizens couldn't pass a citizenship test highlights the potential arbitrariness of such tests, which could be seen as an unnecessary barrier to entry for immigrants who could contribute to economic growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

As mentioned earlier, Keynesianism does not inherently have a stance on immigration or citizenship tests. Some Keynesians may argue that barriers to immigration, such as citizenship tests, could hinder economic growth by limiting the influx of new workers and consumers. However, this is not a core tenet of Keynesianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

Keynesianism is primarily an economic theory focused on government intervention in the economy to stabilize business cycles and promote growth. It does not inherently have a stance on immigration or citizenship tests. However, some Keynesians may argue that immigrants contribute to economic growth and should be integrated into society, which could include passing a basic citizenship test. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but it should only cover very basic and simple topics

Again, Keynesianism does not inherently have a stance on immigration or citizenship tests. Some Keynesians may argue that a basic and simple test could help integrate immigrants into society without creating significant barriers to entry, which could be beneficial for economic growth. However, this is not a core tenet of Keynesianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and it should test more than just a basic level of understanding

While Keynesianism does not directly address immigration or citizenship tests, a more stringent test may be seen as a barrier to immigration, which could potentially limit economic growth. However, this is not a central issue for Keynesianism, so the disagreement would be mild. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.