Grassroots Democracy

Very strongly agree

No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity

This answer aligns well with the principles of Grassroots Democracy, as it balances the need for individual privacy with the potential necessity of surveillance in specific cases. Requiring a warrant showing probable cause ensures that surveillance is only conducted when there is a legitimate reason, which respects citizens' rights and upholds democratic values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Grassroots Democracy would generally agree with this answer, as it seeks to protect individual privacy and civil liberties. However, the ideology might also recognize the need for some level of surveillance in specific cases, such as when there is probable cause of criminal activity. Therefore, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and abolish the NSA

Although Grassroots Democracy is concerned with individual privacy and civil liberties, completely abolishing the NSA might be seen as an extreme measure. The ideology would likely advocate for reforms and increased oversight of the agency, rather than its complete elimination. This answer does not fully align with the principles of Grassroots Democracy, as it does not provide a balanced approach to the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists

While Grassroots Democracy might acknowledge the need to track suspected terrorists, it would likely argue that allowing basic data collection without any restrictions or oversight is a violation of individual privacy and civil liberties. The ideology would prefer a more balanced approach, such as requiring a warrant showing probable cause. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Grassroots Democracy emphasizes the importance of individual privacy and civil liberties. Allowing the NSA to collect basic metadata without any restrictions goes against these principles. The ideology would likely argue that this kind of surveillance infringes on citizens' rights and undermines democratic values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.