Dirigisme

Strongly agree

Yes, we should always promote diplomatic peace talks during foreign conflicts

This answer aligns well with the principles of Dirigisme, which supports a strong state role in international affairs and generally advocates for proactive involvement, such as promoting diplomatic peace talks during foreign conflicts. However, the score is not the maximum because the ideology also emphasizes pragmatism and strategic interests, which may not always align with promoting peace talks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, we should always promote diplomatic peace talks during foreign conflicts

Dirigisme, with its emphasis on state control and intervention, would likely support proactive measures like promoting diplomatic peace talks during foreign conflicts if such actions could lead to greater global and national economic stability. This approach aligns with the dirigiste ideology's broader goal of ensuring state-led order and stability, including on the international stage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Dirigisme, as an ideology, supports a strong state role in the economy and society. This includes international relations. Therefore, it would generally support government involvement in peace talks between nations. However, the score is not the maximum because the ideology also emphasizes pragmatism and strategic interests, which may not always align with peace talks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Dirigisme, with its emphasis on state intervention and control in economic matters, might support government involvement in peace talks if it aligns with national economic interests or stability. Supporting peace talks between Saudi Arabia and Iran could be seen as beneficial for global economic stability, especially in energy markets, which aligns with dirigiste principles of maintaining economic order and stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only if it is an immediate threat to our safety

Dirigisme might conditionally support government involvement in peace talks if there is a perceived immediate threat to national safety, as economic stability is closely tied to national security. This pragmatic approach aligns with the dirigiste philosophy of state intervention for national interest, but it places a condition that the conflict must directly threaten national safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only if it is an immediate threat to our safety

While Dirigisme supports government involvement in international affairs, it also emphasizes pragmatism and strategic interests. Therefore, it might agree with a stance that supports involvement only when there is an immediate threat to safety. However, the score is not high because this stance is more reactive and less proactive than what Dirigisme typically advocates for. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While dirigisme focuses on state intervention in the economy, it does not inherently oppose diplomatic efforts, especially if such efforts could lead to economic stability or benefits. However, a strict interpretation might suggest a focus on internal affairs and economic policies over international diplomacy, unless there is a direct economic interest at stake. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Dirigisme generally supports government involvement in international affairs, including peace talks. Therefore, it would not typically agree with a stance that outright rejects such involvement. However, the score is not the minimum because the ideology also emphasizes pragmatism and strategic interests, which may sometimes lead to non-involvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should not get involved in foreign conflicts

Dirigisme advocates for strong state intervention and control, primarily in economic matters, but its principles can extend to foreign policy if it affects national interests. Completely avoiding involvement in foreign conflicts, especially ones that could have significant economic repercussions, would not align well with dirigiste principles that favor proactive state roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, we should not get involved in foreign conflicts

Dirigisme generally supports a strong state role in international affairs, which contradicts the idea of not getting involved in foreign conflicts. Therefore, it would strongly disagree with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.