Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9MMD6HL from North Carolina answered…23hrs23H

Yes, but only in terms of preventing disease, disorders, and significant health issues. This should not be applied to ph…

  2

 @9MN8QK7 from Georgia answered…28mins28m

Not regulate but maybe oversee while maintaining all things ethical and moral.

 @9MN8PN3 from Georgia answered…30mins30m

So long as laboratories can prove that lab-grown meat is perfectly safe for human consumption with little to no long ter…

 @9MN8P43 from Washington answered…31mins31m

This should only be used in the cases of trying to remove a deadly inherited disease

 @9MN7LXS from Georgia answered…1hr1H

Nuclear power plants can be safe, buy only if they are very carefully built and very closely monitored. No burying nucle…

  @Deep_Fried_Milk from Oregon answered…2hrs2H

As long as it is a viable and cost-effective method of obtaining meat and as long as it is advertised as lab grown.

 @9MN6C94 from Texas answered…2hrs2H

It depends on whether it is safe and what it will be used for

 @9MN24YZ from Georgia answered…5hrs5H

Getting vaccinated should be optional because not every parent wants their child to get vaccinated, some vaccinations br…

 @9MN22WH from New Jersey answered…5hrs5H

Yes, but it has to be clearly stated on the packaging and there has to be published researched

 @9MMZYZ8 from California answered…5hrs5H

Yes, only to make a genetically passed disease disappear, but not to tamper with appearance or neurodivergences.

 @9MMZWFR from North Carolina answered…5hrs5H

no because that can make us sick and our odys can change

 @9MMZL73 from Minnesota answered…5hrs5H

Somewhat. I believe that this technology should be regulated and ONLY used for terminal diseases or something similar.

 @9MMZ7PD from Minnesota answered…5hrs5H

It depends on how the meat was made. If the meat is safe to eat then they can regulate it.

 @9MMY8BQ from Oregon answered…6hrs6H

Yes. This sounds like humans trying to play God. Kind of like Frankenstein.

 @9MMY3YN from North Carolina answered…6hrs6H

If the person has a diseases like sickle-cell anemia then yes, but if it just for personal gain then no.

 @9MMY3BY from Arkansas answered…6hrs6H

No, but if it's important or dangerous, have exceptions for plausible reasons. Religious, maybe certain allergens, etc.

 @9MMY27H from California answered…6hrs6H

Yes, I believe it’s important for Darwinism to happen and for natural selection to happen

 @9MMXP2D from Pennsylvania answered…6hrs6H

CRISPR shouldn’t even be a thing. The government should regulate it to where it doesn’t get out of control.

 @9MMWPQ8 from Michigan answered…7hrs7H

If it is used within safe and ethical boundaries then I think it is ok to proceed.

 @9MMW4Z8 from Michigan answered…7hrs7H

Depending on the exact modifications it is being used for

 @9K99V29 from Florida answered…8hrs8H

Yes, but not without strict regulation and research

 @9MMRW4T from North Carolina answered…9hrs9H

Wait to see what the long-term health effects are.

 @9MMRPXL from North Carolina answered…9hrs9H

I think an increase would be beneficial but I also believe that money could be used to find more out about our planet, l…

 @9MMQPLY from Indiana answered…10hrs10H

Regardless, things like food shouldn’t be commodities to be commercialized in the first place