Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9MQ8Z96 from Oklahoma answered…43mins43m

Yes, but only after extensive testing has been performed and verified in a triple blind study performed by an independen…

 @9MPNVFC from North Carolina answered…8hrs8H

Schools can have such rules for serious diseases (and with vaccines proven safe to a high degree of certainty), but exce…

 @9MPDYZ3 from New Jersey answered…10hrs10H

No, we should focus on saving the earth, however we should increase NASA's budget because their research doesn't just en…

 @9MP755P from Idaho answered…11hrs11H

Yes, but with exceptions for religious and/or health related reasons (allergy to vaccine, abnormal reactions, etc.)

 @9MNW727 from Minnesota answered…12hrs12H

we should use it until with restriction* more clean options are sustainable, *there should be heavy regulations to m…

 @9MNQHNB from Minnesota answered…14hrs14H

i think it should be a balance since its faster then cleaner alternatives but its more harmful. so 50/50 or a 60/40 bala…

 @9MNQWSF from North Carolina answered…14hrs14H

I think it should be a parent's decision or a child's depending on age. If it's deadly it's important to if it's going t…

 @9MNKM6B from Texas answered…20hrs20H

Yes, to protect young children. However, those who are medically unable to receive vaccines aren't legally required.

 @9MNKM6B from Texas answered…20hrs20H

Yes, because some of the technology could prevent chronic disease or disabilities. As a person with ADHD I would never w…

 @9MNK2RH from Utah answered…21hrs21H

We should see if we can use it to make the next generation of Americans superhuman and immune to genetic diseases. In ot…

 @9MNJ4NY from California answered…23hrs23H

depends, if it is used to help with life-threatening diseases than yes, but if it's to just make an individual's life be…