Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9M8MYM2 from Alabama answered…56mins56m

Ones America get a hold of themselfs and actually manages to find out and capture the people in charge of this

 @9M8KK85 from Massachusetts answered…2hrs2H

Instead of bringing in the military, add or increase a department which aids in dissuading people from using drugs/more…

 @9M8JTFQ from Ohio answered…2hrs2H

It’s more of why are these being sold in the first place, and maybe find a way to have them coexist legally

 @9M8J7T6 from Louisiana answered…3hrs3H

In which they should be captured and given a fair trial, but these trials, especially for those of US citizens could be…

 @9M8J7T6 from Louisiana answered…3hrs3H

If it becomes more of a threat to the safety of our allies and we have evidence proving of this, then the president shou…

 @9M8DFK4 from Massachusetts answered…4hrs4H

Yes but only if there is definite proof for their terrorist acts and that they plan to attack the US

 @9M8BCDR from Illinois answered…5hrs5H

The president should not be able to do what ever they want without getting approval from another part of the government

 @9M8B6JV from Illinois answered…5hrs5H

Legalize all drugs but not for the sake of drugs being legal, to put cartels out of business and once they're down in bu…

 @9M8B6JV from Illinois answered…5hrs5H

let the other countries deal with that, we got too many of our problems and the fact that were all over the world 24/7 j…

 @9M89X2P answered…5hrs5H

i feel like when others get evolved the kids on the border gets hurt, so yes and not to some extent.

 @9M89JHT from Michigan answered…6hrs6H

some people family's are in danger due to drug dealers form mexico and its told on a tv show that shows people trying to…

 @9M88H4V from New York answered…6hrs6H

i feel as though if the cartel didn't feel threatened they wouldn't take transporting drugs to an extreme with killing p…

 @9M87Z6V from Wisconsin answered…6hrs6H

The President and Congress shouldn't be allowed to authorize military force against Al-Qaeda, rather it should be up to…

 @9M86754 from Kansas answered…7hrs7H

Yes, if the President has enough grounds to argue Congress is being irrational and risks American lives by not taking mi…

 @9M84VXR from West Virginia answered…9hrs9H

Yes, but long-term use of force should require Congressional authorization after reaching a set number of days.

 @9M7YN2Y from Indiana answered…16hrs16H

He should listen to his advisors and then do what they decide as a group. Too many in Congress to make a quick decision…

 @9M7Y7Q8 from California answered…17hrs17H

Fix our country first and only get involved if we the people are in danger not oil and corporate greed

 @3868DQW answered…18hrs18H

No, deschedule, regulate, and tax marijuana federally and create rehabilitation care for addicts of schedule 1 drugs.

 @9M7X92J from North Dakota answered…18hrs18H

Only within our borders, and only when the public is satisfied with the answer(s) to why aren't the other agencies effe…

 @9M7X92J from North Dakota answered…18hrs18H

Unless there is an actual crime against our nation(the USA) and/or our US citizens then we need to respect the sovereign…

 @9M7X92J from North Dakota answered…18hrs18H

Firstly congress should have to approve all military actions! The powers of the president involving troops I think were…

 @9M7WZC2 from Indiana answered…18hrs18H

Yes, but for operations within our borders, and attempt to join Mexican forces to mobilize both countries against Mexica…

 @9M7WZC2 from Indiana answered…18hrs18H

If capture is not possible, only if they are in countries not allied to the US. At which point, counties should be able…

 @9M7WZC2 from Indiana answered…18hrs18H

No, should involve the President, Secretary of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Secretary of State (those with knowledge…