Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…14hrs14H

Keir Starmer Kicks Off Campaign with Personal Touch and National Security Pledge

  11replies

 @9N5924T from Wisconsin answered…17mins17m

Only once facial recognition tech has been proved to be completely without bias, and then only in areas of concern

 @9N552QS from Connecticut answered…1hr1H

No, with the best intelligence in the world, the US is already able to track all nine billion humans on this planet simu…

 @9N552QS from Connecticut answered…1hr1H

Yes: The President, as Commander in Chief of the United States Military, does as he damn well pleases, to hell with Cong…

 @9N5273P from Maryland answered…2hrs2H

Congress should add approval to an extent to ensure a president is not taking action due to personal conflict and belief…

 @9N4V7QN from California answered…3hrs3H

Yes, but only in America after they have committed crimes and local law enforcement can’t deal with them

 @9N4MPY3 from Ohio answered…4hrs4H

Only with undeniable proof that they have carried out planned or planning an attack or threat towards the united states.

 @db from Mississippi answered…5hrs5H

If Mexico refuses to take action with our help. It may be necessary to stop the invasion of fentanyl that minors often t…

 @9N4LC3Y from Washington answered…5hrs5H

No, citizens should be allowed to vote on whether or not to go to war with another country as Congress has proven time a…

 @9N4LC3Y from Washington answered…5hrs5H

Yes, but there should be strict limits on who is able to access this data and for what purpose. Similar to how warrants…

 @9N4HK68 from Connecticut answered…5hrs5H

Though we have agencies that already address these issues, they don't do a very good job at de-escalating. I doubt the U…

 @9N4HK68 from Connecticut answered…5hrs5H

Since the attacks against Al-Qaeda caused many civilian casualties, I think the Supreme Court and President should be ca…

 @9N3T5KB from Texas answered…10hrs10H

If suspected of terrorism or threats to society yes. Overall no though because it's a threat to personal security

 @9N3QRTH from California answered…11hrs11H

No, it is very risky and totally unnecessary and the military should focus on more important issues in other parts of th…

 @9N3BL6Q from Missouri answered…15hrs15H

Tech companies should be mandated to vigorously find and report such things if that kind of activity is taking place I.…

 @9N39PDQ from California answered…15hrs15H

No, we should increase border security to deal with this issue, but using the military will escalate the situation and m…

 @9N39PDQ from California answered…15hrs15H

No, and we should never assassinate "suspected" terrorists. This means that they haven't been proven guilty yet. It is n…

 @9N36LZ9 from Florida answered…18hrs18H

It should not be banned, but strongly monitored/ have a limit.

 @9N35ZJJ from Vermont answered…18hrs18H

No, we should lift all sanctions on these nations.

 @9N33CDF from Oklahoma answered…20hrs20H

Absolutely not. If actions happen within our borders that’s a different situation but outside of them no.

 @9N2N6MF from Oklahoma answered…24hrs24H

I believe in the checks and balances. Do I believe a president should be able to protect our country, yes. However, I do…

 @9N2N5F4 from Oklahoma answered…24hrs24H

Yes, but only if the foreign government does not intervene, and the relative promises to use the money as intended.

 @9N2N5F4 from Oklahoma answered…24hrs24H

Yes, but only if the person is considered very dangerous, and the country they're in allows the U.S. to carry out the as…