Yes they should be able to carry their own fire arm as long as their is a back ground check on them before getting a gun.

No, the problem is not guns but a lack of moral accountability. We need to enforce laws and make criminals take responsibility for their actions, including the death penalty for murder.

Shootings in cities could be easily avoided if we outlawed guns altogether and then we wouldn’t have this problem.

Shootings wouldn't be such a problem if you couldn't buy a firearm at a Walmart. Raise regulations and the only people with guns will be the ones who are trained to use them.

By making it easier to get a gun to defend yourself in a situation where someone else has a gun, it makes it easier for someone who want to use a gun for those reasons to get their hands on one.

I agree with this statement. Guns are only a "bad" weapon if used that way. Guns are used for our safety, and that's why concealed carry exists. People need to protect themselves, their family, and their ground. If guns are used for a bad reason, then I think gun rights should be taken away from that specific person unless otherwise shown they can use a gun correctly, properly, and safely.

I entirely agree. Citizens should have the right to protect themselves, and to carry equipment they see fit to do so.

The Second Amendment is a constitutional right and should not be infringed. Criminals don't follow laws. Banning guns only removes the ability of lawful citizens to protect themself. Local law enforcement won't always be there, and sometimes will even avoid such scenarios, such as during the 1992 Los Angeles Riots, when several business owners had to take up arms and defend their homes, businesses, and families against rioters as police did absolutely nothing. In thi…  Read mores day and age, the sad truth is that it can happen to anyone. It's up to the individual to protect themself. Not everyone agrees with lethal force, and I entirely understand if you don't. However, that's not an excuse to take away that ability from other lawful citizens to use such force themselves. At the end of the day, if you don't want to protect yourself with a gun, you don't have to. But that doesn't mean you should stop others from doing so either.

I agree, the only person that you can rely on for your own protection is yourself. With so many people in the world that seek to do harm, it makes little sense to take away means of defense from citizens.

No, With how the world is moving and the increase of shootings in cities, citizens should have the right to legally carry for their own safety

Agreed, if no one has the right to protect themselves from criminals who don't follow the laws, then how does the government expect us to trust them

Citizens should have the right to carry its in he constitution and most people who own guns don't kill, criminals kill.

I agree. Protecting citizens and taking the tools for them to use when protecting themselves, is contradicting.