CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.
59% Yes |
41% No |
59% Yes |
41% No |
See how support for each position on “CRISPR Technology” has changed over time for 1.9k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “CRISPR Technology” has changed over time for 1.9k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9MMD6HL3wks3W
Yes, but only in terms of preventing disease, disorders, and significant health issues. This should not be applied to physical appearance.
@9N73RR71wk1W
Crispr is an abomination. Humans are not meant to be edited or experiment on in this way, or at all.
@9MM2F723wks3W
Yes, should be used only in necessary medical procedures.
@9MLZQLY3wks3W
if used the right way if it could prevent genetic diseases or any other health problems im all for it.
@9MLZ7KV3wks3W
If the modification is being done to help correct something that is wrong, then I think it's good. If it's to change your kids eye color, that's just unnecessary.
@Dry550 3wks3W
Yes, ensure the overseer’s of the regulation are not corrupt and are ethical themselves and that they don’t get in the way of progress
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.