This question considers whether maintaining and repairing current infrastructure should take precedence over constructing new roads and bridges. Proponents argue that it ensures safety, extends the life of existing infrastructure, and is more cost-effective. Opponents argue that new infrastructure is needed to support growth and improve transportation networks.
78% Yes |
22% No |
78% Yes |
22% No |
See how support for each position on “Road Maintenance vs. New Infrastructure” has changed over time for 162 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Road Maintenance vs. New Infrastructure” has changed over time for 162 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9N2N6G35 days5D
I think they should be moderate at doing both when needed.
@9N2FJTH5 days5D
Yes but only on the local level. Private contract should be used for infrastructure.
@7HGKBBP 5 days5D
No, they should continue a hybrid effort of repairing the existent infrastructure while continuing to implement newer eco-friendly options.
@9MZBLLP5 days5D
Both. New infrastructure with crumbling old infrastructure is a waste of money. Infrastructure money has to be responsible spent between repair current and building new.
@RobinHoude 6 days6D
The government should prioritize both maintenance and repair of existing infrastructure and construction of new infrastructure, especially infrastructure that reduces car dependency
@9MXV7HQ6 days6D
No our infrastructure needs rebuilt including power
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
