@ISIDEWITHQuestionstransportationStarted 2wks agoActive 2 days ago

Should the government provide subsidies for the development of high-speed rail networks?

High-speed rail networks are fast train systems that connect major cities, providing a quick and efficient alternative to car and air travel. Proponents argue that it can reduce travel times, lower carbon emissions, and stimulate economic growth through improved connectivity. Opponents argue that it requires significant investment, may not attract enough users, and funds could be better used elsewhere.

69%
Yes
31%
No
69%
Yes
31%
No

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “High Speed Rail” has changed over time for 5.6k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “High Speed Rail” has changed over time for 5.6k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9L4Z23B  from Pennsylvania answered…1wk1W

Yes, the federal government should issue grants and PABs for states with projects on designated high speed corridors (186+ MPH MAS, 155 MPH Average Speed) and higher speed corridors (110-125 MPH MAS, 90-110 MPH Average Speed). States should utilize P3s to help increase efficiency of project development

 @9N28HDM from Georgia answered…5 days5D

Polling in population centers should be done to determine where development should be done for high speed rail and to not penalize areas where it is not wanted by the general public.

 @9MYS7FH from Georgia answered…6 days6D

I feel like it would cause too much construction/damage to the area and will create more havoc in the community.

 @9MYMGYN from Georgia answered…6 days6D

Yes, but great care should be taken to avoid using eminent domain to displace landowners, whenever possible. If they must be displaced, pay them well above market value for their trouble.

 @9MSGYVD from Illinois answered…1wk1W

No, instead we should deregulate the rail industry so that private companies are more likely and able to invest in these forms of transportation.

 @9MPCXDD from Michigan answered…1wk1W

Every attempt in the U.S. to subsidize high-speed rail infrastructure has turned out to be a money hole. Like the California High-Speed Rail Authority! If the organization being subsidized could actually produce results, then I'd be all for it. 100%

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to America voters.

 @ISIDEWITH asked…2mos2MO

What is your reaction to a high-profile politician supporting a candidate from a different political party; is it a savv…

In a series of developments that have stirred the political landscape, former President Donald Trump has publicly endorsed the presidential bid of independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., describing it as 'great for MAGA.' Trump's remarks came after Kennedy announced his vice-presidential pick, further intensifying the political discourse. Trump, in his characteristic style, took to social media to express his views, labeling Kennedy as the 'most radical left' candidate in the race and highlighting the liberal credentials of Kennedy's running mate, Nicole Shanahan. Despite his criticism of their political stance, Trump views Kennedy's candidacy as beneficial for his MAGA movement, suggesting it could potentially divide the Democratic vote.Kennedy, a figure who has long been associated with controversial views, particularly on the rule of law and established science, has drawn criticism and concern from various quarters. His decision to run for president and the subsequent endorsement by Trump has sparked a flurry of reactions, with some seeing it as a strategic move that could impact the Democratic Party's chances in the upcoming elections. Allies of President Joe Biden have expressed alarm over Kennedy's bid, fearing it could siphon off crucial votes from the left, thereby posing a significant threat to Biden's reelection efforts.The political dynamics surrounding Kennedy's candidacy and Trump's endorsement underscore the complex and often unpredictable nature of American politics. As the race for the presidency heats up, the strategies employed by candidates and their supporters are coming under increased scrutiny. The potential impact of Kennedy's run on the Democratic vote is a topic of much speculation, with analysts and political observers closely monitoring the situation.Trump's support for Kennedy, despite their ideological differences, highlights the former president's tactical approach to politics. By endorsing a candidate who could potentially weaken his opponents, Trump is playing a strategic game, aiming to maximize his own chances of success. This move has not only added a new dimension to the political landscape but has also raised questions about the future direction of both the Republican and Democratic parties.As the United States gears up for another presidential election, the emergence of candidates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the reactions they provoke from figures like Donald Trump are indicative of the shifting sands of American politics. With the electorate increasingly polarized, the outcome of the election remains uncertain, and the strategies adopted by candidates will be crucial in determining the path forward.

▲  2