More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Race (Asian) voters
Last answered 5 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Race (Asian) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Sep 25, 2012. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Race data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by youtube.com
6 years ago by theguardian.com
6 years ago by iflscience.com
6 years ago by elitedaily.com
6 years ago by youtube.com
6 years ago by youtube.com
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
For a workers' party. For a workers' government. Expropriate the entire power industry. 6 years ago from a Green in Saint Petersburg, FL
The wind power industry should solve it's own problems related to the environment first, before
accepting or being given tax credits and subsidies. Problem example: The huge amount of
birds, including endangered specie, that are killed by the... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Bryn Mawr, PA
No. Wind power is a flawed system w high maintenance cost and low out put. We should invest more into solar fields. Low cost with high yield. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Waimanalo, HI
No, the government should internalize all the externalities of all energy sources (e.g. introduce a carbon tax) and let the market decide. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Piedmont, CA
Yes, alternative energy is important, but wind farms are seriously harming bat populations, so we should also continue to look for less damaging options. 6 years ago from a Green in Fishers, IN
No, the federal government should only subsidize/credit industries for limited durations, in cases where the financial boost will allow the industry to develop an edge over foreign competition and where the financial benefits will remain inside the US. 6 years ago from a Green in San Francisco, CA
Yes, but not to the point of picking winners and losers. Subsidies are meant to help businesses compete against monopolies but shouldn't go so far as to dictate our purchasing options. 6 years ago from a Republican in Fairfield, IA
No, invest in rooftop solar. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Washington, DC
If the production of wind turbines (and other wind-based electrical generators) produce positive externalities, then the government should subsidize production at an amount equal to the value of those positive externalities. 6 years ago from a Republican in Ewa Beach, HI
No, there needs to be a audit of what forms of energy we can sustain and what is the most cost effective. That form should get credits and tax breaks. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Washington, DC