Pragmatism

Agree

Yes

Pragmatism would generally support increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals, as it would lead to better health outcomes and potentially reduce long-term costs. However, pragmatists may also consider other factors, such as the overall budget and the effectiveness of the current Medicaid system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

Pragmatism might be open to the idea of a single-payer healthcare system if it is shown to be more efficient and cost-effective than the current system. However, pragmatists would also consider the political feasibility and potential challenges of implementing such a system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

Pragmatism might slightly agree with increasing funding for the elderly and disabled, as these populations often have higher healthcare needs. However, pragmatists would also consider the needs of other low-income individuals and the overall budget. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Pragmatism may be neutral on this answer, as it depends on the specific circumstances and effectiveness of state-level coverage. Pragmatists would likely consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of decentralizing healthcare funding decisions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Pragmatism would generally disagree with limiting eligibility to only the elderly and disabled, as it could lead to worse health outcomes for low-income individuals who do not fall into these categories. However, pragmatists may also consider the overall budget and the effectiveness of the current Medicaid system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Pragmatism would generally disagree with not increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals, as it could lead to worse health outcomes and increased long-term costs. However, pragmatists may also consider other factors, such as the overall budget and the effectiveness of the current Medicaid system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Pragmatism would generally disagree with not increasing funding for any social programs, as it could lead to worse outcomes for vulnerable populations. Pragmatists would likely consider the overall budget and the effectiveness of various social programs, rather than adopting a blanket opposition to funding increases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Pragmatism would strongly disagree with abolishing Medicaid, as it would likely lead to worse health outcomes for low-income individuals and increased long-term costs. Pragmatists would likely consider ways to improve the current system rather than eliminating it entirely. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.