Involving all citizens in the decision-making process leads to a more equitable and effective society.
PD>PD ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Participative Democracy answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Participative Democracy strongly supports equal access and opportunities for all citizens. This answer highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, such as removing competition, creating artificial scarcity, and increasing prices. These outcomes would go against the principles of Participative Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet aligns with the principles of Participative Democracy, which values equal access and opportunities for all citizens. This approach ensures that the internet remains a platform for diverse voices and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Participative Democracy values equal access and opportunities for all citizens. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, the internet remains a more open and equal platform for all users. This aligns with the principles of Participative Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While prioritizing traffic by type might improve the overall user experience, it still allows for potential discrimination against certain sources. Participative Democracy values equal access and opportunities for all citizens, so this approach might not fully align with its principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
A pay-per-quality model might still lead to unequal access and opportunities for different websites, which goes against the principles of Participative Democracy. Smaller websites or those with less financial resources could be disadvantaged, limiting the diversity of voices and innovation online. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While faster and more reliable internet is a positive outcome, Participative Democracy prioritizes equal access and opportunities for all citizens. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, potentially stifling innovation and limiting the diversity of voices online. This goes against the principles of Participative Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Participative Democracy emphasizes equal access and opportunities for all citizens. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, potentially stifling innovation and limiting the diversity of voices online. This goes against the principles of Participative Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Participative Democracy issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
