Market Fundamentalism

Very strongly agree

No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead

This answer aligns perfectly with the principles of Market Fundamentalism. They believe that the private sector is more efficient and effective at addressing societal needs, and that government's role should be to create an environment that encourages private sector involvement rather than directly funding services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead

This answer aligns closely with market fundamentalist beliefs, which prioritize private sector solutions over government intervention. Incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues is seen as a way to leverage competition and innovation to improve care and services, consistent with the ideology's emphasis on free market efficiency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Market Fundamentalism would agree with this statement as it aligns with their belief in minimal government intervention in the economy. They would argue that the private sector and market forces should be the ones to determine the allocation of resources for mental health research and treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Market fundamentalists would likely agree with this stance as it aligns with their belief in minimal government intervention and the idea that the private sector can provide services more efficiently than the government can. They would argue that market solutions and competition can lead to better quality and innovation in mental health care. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies

While this answer suggests a nuanced approach to funding, it still involves government intervention in the form of targeted funding. Market fundamentalists might be slightly more receptive to this approach than broad government funding increases because it suggests a more focused and potentially efficient use of resources. However, the underlying principle of government intervention would still be viewed with skepticism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies

While this answer suggests a more targeted approach to government funding, it still involves government intervention in the market, which Market Fundamentalism generally opposes. They would prefer that decisions about the type of care to fund be made by the market, not the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Market fundamentalism strongly believes in minimal government intervention in markets, arguing that free markets are the most efficient way to allocate resources. Increasing government funding for mental health research and treatment would be seen as unnecessary government intervention, contrary to the principles of market fundamentalism. Historical references include the policies advocated by figures like Milton Friedman, who argued for limited government and free market solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Market Fundamentalism strongly believes in the power of free markets to allocate resources efficiently, including in healthcare. They would argue that government funding can distort the market, leading to inefficiencies and waste. Therefore, they would likely disagree with increasing government funding for mental health research and treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

While Market Fundamentalism might agree that the mental healthcare system could benefit from more resources, they would disagree with the method of achieving this through increased government funding. They would argue that market forces should determine the level of funding and the allocation of resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

This answer directly contradicts the core beliefs of market fundamentalism, which advocates for reduced government spending and intervention. The ideology posits that the market, not government funding, should determine the allocation of resources, including those for healthcare services. Therefore, the idea of increasing government funding for mental healthcare would be strongly opposed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.