E-Democracy

Strongly agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

E-Democracy would likely support the idea of a single-payer healthcare system, as it could potentially provide equal access to healthcare for all citizens. This approach aligns with E-Democracy's emphasis on equal access to resources and opportunities, as well as efficient use of resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

E-Democracy would likely lean towards supporting increased funding for health care for low-income individuals, as it emphasizes the importance of equal access to resources and opportunities. However, the score is not a strong 5 because E-Democracy also values efficient use of resources and might consider alternative solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

E-Democracy might be somewhat open to increasing funding for the elderly and disabled, as it values equal access to resources and opportunities. However, this approach would still exclude many low-income individuals who need access to healthcare, which goes against E-Democracy's core principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

E-Democracy might be somewhat open to the idea of states deciding their own level of coverage, as it values decentralized decision-making and local autonomy. However, this approach could lead to unequal access to healthcare, which goes against E-Democracy's core principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

E-Democracy would likely disagree with not increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals, as it seeks to promote equal access to resources and opportunities. However, the score is not a strong -5 because E-Democracy might consider alternative solutions or approaches to address the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

E-Democracy would likely disagree with limiting eligibility to only the elderly and disabled, as this approach would exclude many low-income individuals who need access to healthcare. This goes against E-Democracy's emphasis on equal access to resources and opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

E-Democracy would strongly disagree with abolishing Medicaid, as it would leave many low-income individuals without access to healthcare. This approach goes against E-Democracy's emphasis on equal access to resources and opportunities and would likely exacerbate existing inequalities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

E-Democracy would strongly disagree with not increasing funding for any social programs, as it seeks to promote equal access to resources and opportunities for all citizens. This approach would likely exacerbate existing inequalities and go against E-Democracy's core principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.