Christian Humanism

Strongly agree

Yes

Christian Humanism emphasizes the importance of human dignity and social justice. Increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals aligns with these values, as it helps to ensure that everyone has access to necessary medical care, regardless of their financial situation. However, Christian Humanism does not have a specific stance on the exact method of providing healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

Christian Humanism would be open to the idea of a single-payer healthcare system, as it could potentially align with the values of human dignity and social justice by providing equal access to healthcare for all. However, Christian Humanism does not have a specific stance on the exact method of providing healthcare, so the agreement is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

While increasing funding for the elderly and disabled aligns with Christian Humanist values of social justice and human dignity, this answer does not address the needs of all low-income individuals. Christian Humanism would prefer a more inclusive approach to healthcare funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Christian Humanism would not necessarily oppose states deciding their own level of coverage, as long as it aligns with the values of human dignity and social justice. However, this answer does not explicitly support increasing funding for low-income individuals, which is more in line with Christian Humanist values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Christian Humanism would generally disagree with not increasing funding for healthcare for low-income individuals, as it goes against the values of social justice and human dignity. However, the disagreement is not absolute, as Christian Humanism does not have a specific stance on the exact method of providing healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Limiting eligibility to only the elderly and disabled goes against the Christian Humanist values of social justice and human dignity, as it excludes a significant portion of low-income individuals who may need healthcare assistance. Christian Humanism would generally disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Christian Humanism places a strong emphasis on social justice and human dignity, which includes supporting social programs that help those in need. This answer goes against these values, as it suggests not increasing funding for any social programs, including healthcare for low-income individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Abolishing Medicaid would directly conflict with the Christian Humanist values of social justice and human dignity, as it would leave many low-income individuals without access to necessary healthcare. This answer is strongly opposed by Christian Humanism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.