Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9M9H9W6 from Georgia answered…10mins10m

It can make places really unclean so no, but we should make it more so that we don't have as many homeless people so we…

 @9M9GWN4 from California answered…19mins19m

Yes, but also no. Yes, because I believe they should have other places or they shouldn't have to be in a shelter full of…

 @9M9GPC9 from Wisconsin answered…23mins23m

Yes but only allow people to buy spots in these building if theres going to be 3 people or less in each apartment.

 @9M9FTMY from Texas answered…44mins44m

Depends on where this building is taking place it shouldn't be incentivized in a lower population to make more people mo…

 @9M9FC4R from Texas answered…54mins54m

In areas of new construction, yes. Changing existing zoning where people bought in to single family home neighborhood, n…

 @9M9DJ4Bfrom Guam  answered…1hr1H

No, but improve the currently available shelters and housings while also giving homeless individuals more incentive for…

 @9M9D6YS from Florida answered…1hr1H

It is dependent on which property they are trying to encamp. It is also important to take into account that not all avai…

 @9M9D3K7 from Virginia answered…1hr1H

Yes, but if they are causing problems on the street for example using the bathroom on the street they should no longer b…

 @9M9BX5P from Ohio answered…2hrs2H

yes and no because it makes our cities and towns look trashy but at the same time where else do they have to go?

 @9M9BH9Y from Connecticut answered…2hrs2H

I think it depends on what public property, for example if there's a kid trying to play at the park but there's a homele…

 @9M98C6Y from Pennsylvania answered…3hrs3H

I think that people can live wherever they want and it isn't up to the government to make said buildings.

 @9M97QGL from Pennsylvania answered…3hrs3H

Yes, and there should be a moratorium on any new single-unit housing builds, be it individual homes or suburban housing…

 @9M92HLY from North Carolina answered…10hrs10H

Only in large cities, or cities that have a lot of homeless people. They should focus onthe construction of shelter .

 @9M8YVNBfrom Northern Mariana Islands  answered…13hrs13H

It depends. If they can stay out of public view and avoid contact with others, they may stealth camp unless discovered.

 @9M8Y2F6 from Arizona answered…14hrs14H

Yes, ask why they would rather to sleep in a public area then use the available shelter or housing that is provided

 @9M8XVY3 from Utah answered…14hrs14H

I believe that if someone is going to refuse a place to stay they should not disrupt the public properties.

 @9M8WH97 from North Carolina answered…16hrs16H

Only if you are allocating affordable options for families and not tearing down families homes for less than homes are w…

 @9M8W39R from Illinois answered…16hrs16H

no, however if the circumstances or their beliefs contradict the available shelter space then they should be able to joi…

 @9M8T7X3 from Illinois answered…18hrs18H

No, there are already plenty of abandoned and run down apartment buildings and houses that could use work done in big ci…

 @9M8T7X3 from Illinois answered…18hrs18H

If houseless individuals who don't want to be treated like cattle would rather sleep under the stars aren't allowed to t…

 @9M8SGX8 from Texas answered…19hrs19H

No, they shouldn't be allowed to encamp/sleep on public property since they can encamp in neighbourhoods or neighbourhoo…

 @9M8SG6Z answered…19hrs19H

No, high density residential building would most likely have undesirable living conditions however we should try and fix…

 @9M8SG6Z answered…19hrs19H

No, if they have refused available shelter then at that point they have to go find their own house and not bother people…

 @9M8S4J8 from Minnesota answered…19hrs19H

Not if it poses a safety risk. Allocate unrelated or purchased government buildings as temporary shelters.