Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

  @lemans3427 from California submitted…3 days3D

Democrats Crack Down On Wall Street Firms Buying Homes

  2515 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2 days2D

New Energy Rules Will Add $31K To The Cost Of New Home

  1710 replies

 @9M473Q8 answered…32mins32m

If they don't sleep in a shelter and cannot sleep comfortably anywhere any of the time the likelihood of sleep deprivati…

 @9M44JLQ from Missouri answered…1hr1H

There should be a limitation to how many people are living within one area. But to be more compact isn’t a bad idea

 @9M438MG from Utah answered…2hrs2H

I don't think they should treat a local park as a small village of refugees but don't make it illegal just provide more…

 @9M42JQV from Florida answered…2hrs2H

It depends if the available shelter or housing is good enough to support someone and give them happiness. The place they…

 @9M3YQ7N from Georgia answered…3hrs3H

no, because if housing and other necessities are given for free then they should take them rather than staying on the st…

 @9M3XVV9 from Texas answered…3hrs3H

Yes, and make sure rent is kept in a reasonable and affordable range as to not further push the concern of possible home…

 @9M3XDT7 answered…3hrs3H

they should make required check ups for those with issues and provide jobs to lead them back to society

 @9M3WVXM from North Carolina answered…3hrs3H

as long as they are not harming anyone or causing problems then they should be able to sleep/encamp there

 @9M3WFDH from Texas answered…3hrs3H

Depends on what they’re doing if they’re setting up a huge camp kinda like skidrow or “the zone” in Arizona absolutely n…

 @9M3T8VX from Washington answered…4hrs4H

i think there should be limits to where they can be, but things like the woods or somewhere out of the way of traffic or…

 @9M3RF8W from Oklahoma answered…4hrs4H

Yes, because It depends on the situation and some of the places people go to they get assaulted or worse.

 @9M3QQ4P from Texas answered…5hrs5H

No, because if people see that we are letting homeless people sleep in public property more and more homeless people wou…

 @9M3QB9D from Colorado answered…5hrs5H

Homeless individuals who have refused shelter or housing shouldn't be allowed to encamp on public property which isn't l…

 @9M3PW3S from Michigan answered…5hrs5H

Homeless should not be refused for a shelter. Shelters should be built for everyone who is in need. They should not be a…

 @9M3MQDG from North Carolina answered…6hrs6H

If they are interfering with the lives of others, they should not be allowed on specific properties. They should go to t…

 @9M3LSL8 from Minnesota answered…6hrs6H

They should, as long as it's mostly desolate and doesn't have much importance in the place. I'm not saying they deserve…

 @9M3L9KV from Georgia answered…6hrs6H

Yes, if it is public, but if they are declared an issue and public nuisance. They must be removed and trespassed.

 @9M3KVCG from Florida answered…6hrs6H

I think that different sections of cities should take harder stances on the subject than others. If they are breaking th…

 @9M3KMPP from Kentucky answered…6hrs6H

i feel like its a matter of the case because if they refused and had a good reason to we shouldnt punish them because we…

 @9M3JNQ2 from Georgia answered…6hrs6H

Yes I think they should be allowed to encamp on public property because of course it is public, but after a certain peri…

 @9M3CM8C from Georgia answered…8hrs8H

I would have ti say that it depends on the reason why they don't want to be put in a shelter, someone could be trying to…

 @9M2WQ9P from Pennsylvania answered…18hrs18H

Yes, however, there should be limitations regarding location. Like don't encamp near a preschool, you creep.