Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

  @lemans3427 from California submitted…3 days3D

Democrats Crack Down On Wall Street Firms Buying Homes

  2515 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2 days2D

New Energy Rules Will Add $31K To The Cost Of New Home

  1710 replies

 @9M4J29S from Arkansas answered…5mins5m

Yes, but they should also require a certain percentage of the homes/condos to be sold to individuals (as opposed to all…

 @9M4GMBC from California answered…7mins7m

i believe that we are building to many building and there isnt alot of green so we should build building that can hold a…

 @9M4HPCT from Colorado answered…28mins28m

No, but do create opportunities for Homeless to get Job's without a Permanent Place of Residence and offer more programs…

 @9M4H9T2 from New York answered…56mins56m

No. Because nonprofit private developers end up owning these building paid for by the taxpayer. People can live in rural…

 @9M4H9T2 from New York answered…56mins56m

Those who are actively psychotic or addicted to drugs and threaten others should be immediately locked up and medicated…

 @9M4F2PR from Maryland answered…3hrs3H

Renovate existing abandoned buildings, use them to house the homeless, and incorporate programs to enable the homeless t…

 @9M4F2PR from Maryland answered…3hrs3H

Normally what is offered can be more dangerous than being in the street. Create resources and pathways from homelessness…

 @9M4BD82 from West Virginia answered…5hrs5H

Use the unused spaces, like empty schools and other store types, to turn into low income housing with assistance, or eve…

 @9M49HF8from Virgin Islands  answered…6hrs6H

Only if necessary according to the density of the population and the number of those who would have a better condition o…

 @9M497Z9 from Texas answered…6hrs6H

I say no but they should have their own place to go or like have the city give them there own space and free food

 @9M48F8S from Colorado answered…6hrs6H

Allow homeless individuals to sleep and encamp on public property but only if diagnosed with a sort of medical condition…

 @9M473Q8 answered…7hrs7H

If they don't sleep in a shelter and cannot sleep comfortably anywhere any of the time the likelihood of sleep deprivati…

 @9M44JLQ from Missouri answered…8hrs8H

There should be a limitation to how many people are living within one area. But to be more compact isn’t a bad idea

 @9M438MG from Utah answered…8hrs8H

I don't think they should treat a local park as a small village of refugees but don't make it illegal just provide more…

 @9M42JQV from Florida answered…8hrs8H

It depends if the available shelter or housing is good enough to support someone and give them happiness. The place they…

 @9M3YQ7N from Georgia answered…9hrs9H

no, because if housing and other necessities are given for free then they should take them rather than staying on the st…

 @9M3XVV9 from Texas answered…9hrs9H

Yes, and make sure rent is kept in a reasonable and affordable range as to not further push the concern of possible home…

 @9M3XDT7 answered…9hrs9H

they should make required check ups for those with issues and provide jobs to lead them back to society

 @9M3WVXM from North Carolina answered…10hrs10H

as long as they are not harming anyone or causing problems then they should be able to sleep/encamp there

 @9M3WFDH from Texas answered…10hrs10H

Depends on what they’re doing if they’re setting up a huge camp kinda like skidrow or “the zone” in Arizona absolutely n…

 @9M3T8VX from Washington answered…10hrs10H

i think there should be limits to where they can be, but things like the woods or somewhere out of the way of traffic or…

 @9M3RF8W from Oklahoma answered…11hrs11H

Yes, because It depends on the situation and some of the places people go to they get assaulted or worse.