Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

  @lemans3427 from California submitted…3 days3D

Democrats Crack Down On Wall Street Firms Buying Homes

  2515 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2 days2D

New Energy Rules Will Add $31K To The Cost Of New Home

  1710 replies

 @9M4F2PR from Maryland answered…16mins16m

Renovate existing abandoned buildings, use them to house the homeless, and incorporate programs to enable the homeless t…

 @9M4F2PR from Maryland answered…16mins16m

Normally what is offered can be more dangerous than being in the street. Create resources and pathways from homelessness…

 @9M4BD82 from West Virginia answered…2hrs2H

Use the unused spaces, like empty schools and other store types, to turn into low income housing with assistance, or eve…

 @9M49HF8from Virgin Islands  answered…3hrs3H

Only if necessary according to the density of the population and the number of those who would have a better condition o…

 @9M497Z9 from Texas answered…3hrs3H

I say no but they should have their own place to go or like have the city give them there own space and free food

 @9M48F8S from Colorado answered…4hrs4H

Allow homeless individuals to sleep and encamp on public property but only if diagnosed with a sort of medical condition…

 @9M473Q8 answered…4hrs4H

If they don't sleep in a shelter and cannot sleep comfortably anywhere any of the time the likelihood of sleep deprivati…

 @9M44JLQ from Missouri answered…5hrs5H

There should be a limitation to how many people are living within one area. But to be more compact isn’t a bad idea

 @9M438MG from Utah answered…5hrs5H

I don't think they should treat a local park as a small village of refugees but don't make it illegal just provide more…

 @9M42JQV from Florida answered…6hrs6H

It depends if the available shelter or housing is good enough to support someone and give them happiness. The place they…

 @9M3YQ7N from Georgia answered…6hrs6H

no, because if housing and other necessities are given for free then they should take them rather than staying on the st…

 @9M3XVV9 from Texas answered…6hrs6H

Yes, and make sure rent is kept in a reasonable and affordable range as to not further push the concern of possible home…

 @9M3XDT7 answered…7hrs7H

they should make required check ups for those with issues and provide jobs to lead them back to society

 @9M3WVXM from North Carolina answered…7hrs7H

as long as they are not harming anyone or causing problems then they should be able to sleep/encamp there

 @9M3WFDH from Texas answered…7hrs7H

Depends on what they’re doing if they’re setting up a huge camp kinda like skidrow or “the zone” in Arizona absolutely n…

 @9M3T8VX from Washington answered…7hrs7H

i think there should be limits to where they can be, but things like the woods or somewhere out of the way of traffic or…

 @9M3RF8W from Oklahoma answered…8hrs8H

Yes, because It depends on the situation and some of the places people go to they get assaulted or worse.

 @9M3QQ4P from Texas answered…8hrs8H

No, because if people see that we are letting homeless people sleep in public property more and more homeless people wou…

 @9M3QB9D from Colorado answered…8hrs8H

Homeless individuals who have refused shelter or housing shouldn't be allowed to encamp on public property which isn't l…

 @9M3PW3S from Michigan answered…8hrs8H

Homeless should not be refused for a shelter. Shelters should be built for everyone who is in need. They should not be a…

 @9M3MQDG from North Carolina answered…9hrs9H

If they are interfering with the lives of others, they should not be allowed on specific properties. They should go to t…

 @9M3LSL8 from Minnesota answered…9hrs9H

They should, as long as it's mostly desolate and doesn't have much importance in the place. I'm not saying they deserve…