Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

  @lemans3427 from California submitted…2 days2D

Democrats Crack Down On Wall Street Firms Buying Homes

  2415 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1 day1D

New Energy Rules Will Add $31K To The Cost Of New Home

  1710 replies

 @9M2SJG8 from Ohio answered…26mins26m

Yes, as long as they aren't putting themselves or others in danger by doing so. Also, public showers, toilets, and more…

 @9M2SG23 from Colorado answered…32mins32m

I think the government should encourage lowering the birth rate. We're full to bursting on this planet. And we don't hav…

 @9M2SG23 from Colorado answered…32mins32m

No, but there should be public camping sites with food, clothing, and medical/behavioral health care available, and supe…

 @9M2NF4V from Texas answered…3hrs3H

No, if they have chose not to take an opportunity then they should not be allowed to camp on public property.

 @9M2LR65 from Washington answered…4hrs4H

if you’ve been offered a place to stay & you refuse why are you on the streets asking for money? encamp.

 @9M2KZFD from New Jersey answered…4hrs4H

No, they shouldn't, and the government should back off and let private volunteer organizations help fund these people

 @9M2J9KD from Ohio answered…5hrs5H

I think that homeless people should be allowed on certain public properties at certain times if they refuse available sh…

 @9M2J4XM from Ohio answered…5hrs5H

No, but more social outreach programs should be developed in order to aid and reach those who attempt to sleep or encamp…

 @9M2HQBS from Washington answered…5hrs5H

I think the government should incentivize people to move out to more rural areas to spread the population out. Which, wo…

 @9M2GFXK from Oklahoma answered…6hrs6H

Only if they doing something bad. Or the government needs to make signs saying you can't stay there.

 @9M2FKHW from Illinois answered…6hrs6H

Yes, and the government should be able to use the concept of eminent domain if met with remarkable resistance.

 @9M2FKHW from Illinois answered…6hrs6H

Yes, but they should be questioned on the reasoning and that should be incorporated into future thought.

 @9M2F6J9 from Indiana answered…6hrs6H

Yes, but make sure that they are well built and environmentally friendly in order to reduce their environmental impact.…

 @9M2CS9J from Texas answered…7hrs7H

no but create more places to provide shelter for people, or freshen them off and send them to a job interview.

 @9M2C562 from Virginia answered…7hrs7H

I believe if a person has knowingly refused shelter, they should not be allowed to camp anywhere, but I don't think it s…

 @9M29Z9M from North Carolina answered…7hrs7H

they can stay in there camps just dont mess up the surrounding area other than that i could care less

 @9M29M33 from Pennsylvania answered…8hrs8H

We should make places in the public for them not shelterz because some people need help but don't want to let other see…

 @9M29BQR from Illinois answered…8hrs8H

Public property... no one owns so no one can kick them out. Unless they making things dirty and a mess.

 @9M27XZH from Massachusetts answered…8hrs8H

Yes, but also conduct a drug test to see if the decision was of their own or from the influence of narcotics, then if po…

 @9M27D3W from Utah answered…9hrs9H

i think they should be allowed to do so but most homeless people don't simply refuse available shelter or housing theres…

 @9M276CV from New York answered…9hrs9H

Yes if the area would be or is okay with it, and if we could provide people proper stuff to take care of themselves but…

 @9M26VX5 from Utah answered…9hrs9H

Yes, as long as it does not interfere with any public business, contract or event, obstruct the public people or disturb…